IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2015id54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epistemological Status of Models and Thought Experiments in Economics

Author

Listed:
  • O. Koshovets
  • T. Varkhotov

Abstract

The paper considers the analogy of theoretical modeling and thought experiment in economics. The authors provide historical and epistemological analysis of thought experiments and their relations to the material experiments in natural science. They conclude that thought experiments as instruments are used both in physics and in economics, but in radically different ways. In the natural science, a thought experiment is tightly connected to the material experimentation, while in economics it is used in isolation. Material experiments serve as a means to demonstrate the reality, while thought experiments cannot be a full-fledged instrument of studying the reality. Rather, they constitute the instrument of structuring the field of inquiry.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Koshovets & T. Varkhotov, 2015. "Epistemological Status of Models and Thought Experiments in Economics," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 2.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2015:id:54
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2015-2-123-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/54/54
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-2-123-140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2015:id:54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.