IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2011id1239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?

Author

Listed:
  • Ch. Pissarides

Abstract

The author discusses the failure of the canonical search and matching model to explain the cyclical volatility in the job finding rate. The author - the Nobel Prize winner in economics in 2010 - shows that job creation in the model is influenced by wages in new matches. He summarizes microeconometric evidence and finds that wages in new matches are volatile and consistent with the models key predictions. Therefore, explanations of the unemployment volatility puzzle have to preserve the cyclical volatility of wages. The author discusses a modification of the model, based on fixed matching costs, that can increase cyclical unemployment volatility and is consistent with wage flexibility in new matches.

Suggested Citation

  • Ch. Pissarides, 2011. "The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 1.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2011:id:1239
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2011-1-65-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1239/1240
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-1-65-88?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2011:id:1239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.