IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2008id1312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To the Dispute about the Method: Poverty Research or Poverty of Research? (On the Paper by M. Lokshin “Does Poverty Research in Russia Follow the Scientific Method?”)

Author

Listed:
  • G. Kleiner

Abstract

The paper prepared in connection with the publication of the article by M. Lokshin discusses some central issues of the methodology, technique and interpretation of results of economic research. Structuring the corpus of studies is offered depending on the degree of using empirical, phenomenological and theoretical knowledge of the investigated phenomenon. On the basis of the analysis of typical processes of modeling socio-economic phenomena the conclusion is made about the significant influence of subjective and tool assumptions on the results of modeling that complicates their simple interpretation. The necessity of publishing the full spectrum of scientific articles - from critical reviews and essays to empirical calculations - in each field of research including poverty studies is grounded.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Kleiner, 2008. "To the Dispute about the Method: Poverty Research or Poverty of Research? (On the Paper by M. Lokshin “Does Poverty Research in Russia Follow the Scientific Method?”)," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 6.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2008:id:1312
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2008-6-61-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1312/1313
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-6-61-70?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2008:id:1312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.