IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2008id1254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

J. M. Keynes as the Last Economist of Mainstream and a Precursor of Theoretical and Methodological Pluralism

Author

Listed:
  • N. Shapiro

Abstract

The article shows the methodological ambiguity of Keynes’ ideas. The simplified treatment of his views on the part of his followers is criticized. The author shows the difference between Keynes’ methodological disputes with classics and his debate with mathematical economists and econometricians, in particular with J. Tinbergen. It is shown that methodological discussions of 1930-1940 are actual for the assessment of the current state of economic science in Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Shapiro, 2008. "J. M. Keynes as the Last Economist of Mainstream and a Precursor of Theoretical and Methodological Pluralism," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 1.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2008:id:1254
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-120-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1254/1255
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-120-130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2008:id:1254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.