IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2014i1p127-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open governance: problems and prospects for Russia

Author

Abstract

The article reviews a new public administration paradigm - Open Government in the governance reform context. The authors provide a definition of the term "Open Government" and analyze international practices in implementing and evaluating the openness.The article suggests a new conceptual vision of the public administration reform based on the openness values and principles in Russia.The articles structure is determined by the authors goal to justify the necessity to move to a new public administration paradigm in times of information society. To implement the goal the authors provide (1) the Open Government definition formation and analysis, (2) an international strategies summary for the openness movement in leading countries, (3) the openness measurement and an evaluation framework, (4) a barriers analysis for the open government mechanisms implementation in Russia. The research is focused on the potential advantages distinction from the open government implementation.Modern Russias legislative and administrative practices research brings to a conclusion that the openness values and tools implementation will help to find balance and decrease tension in the relations between the state and society. One of the key findings of the study is recommendations development to increase the trust level between the state and society and improve the feedback loop efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Dmitrieva & Evgenyi Styrin, 2014. "Open governance: problems and prospects for Russia," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 127-148.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2014:i:1:p:127-148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2014/10/08/1100895055/%D0%94%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0,%20%D0%A1%D1%82%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ревякин С. А., 2019. "Функциональность Электронных Платформ Общественного Участия: Причем Здесь Социальные Сети?," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 3, pages 88-106.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2014:i:1:p:127-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.