Author
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed various analytical methods for comparing or benchmarking technologies widely applied due to multiple public sector reforms. Such mechanisms became widespread because sometimes there was a lack of other criteria to assess better performance except for comparing separate characteristic features of the systems being analyzed. Besides, introduction of management by objectives gave rise to multiple targets, which might be used as a base for comparison. Thus, along with the necessity for, nowadays there appeared a strong possibility for making effective use of benchmarking to manage changes and searching for a second better decision, including public management improvement. The article presents theoretical benchmarking issues, gives a brief outline for benchmarking initiatives derived from the world practices, and sets the requirements for public service benchmarking systems. Practices for better performance assessment, comparing activities and outcomes of government bodies, local authorities and regional structures should become an essential tool in the analysis of the current status, planning/developing of the changes in the context of public management reforms being carried out. Therefore, the article sets forward legal and guidance documents contents proposals, enabling introduction of benchmarking system into the current practices of executive bodies of an entity within the Russian Federation. The authors of the article conclude that introduction of benchmarking practices into planning and budgeting schemes for government bodies and other organizations, delivering public services, is considered to be the most essential condition for benchmarking efficiency in executive bodies. It is advisable to facilitate such integration taking into account the decisions made on the targets legal status and correlation mechanism of the achieved target values and the amount of financing given to services suppliers.
Suggested Citation
Vladimir Eliseenko & Konstantin Golovshchinskiy, 2008.
"Introduction of integral benchmarking systems into executive bodies’ performance,"
Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 118-130.
Handle:
RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2008:i:2:p:118-130
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2008:i:2:p:118-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.