IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/nomsmr/10.15358-2511-8676-2019-1-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Service Employees Should Not Go the Extra Mile: The Interaction Between Perceived Employee Effort and Customer Misbehaviour Severity

Author

Listed:
  • Rummelhagen, Katja
  • Benkenstein, Martin

Abstract

The prevalence of customer misbehaviour challenges managers and employees to apply the right strategy to deviant customers while keeping other customers satisfied. Although a high level of employee effort is deemed best in most service literature, the present research questions the overall effectiveness of such effort. A study with two service contexts confirms that the effect of employee effort on other customers’ satisfaction is greatly influenced by the severity of the observed customer misbehaviour. Indeed, a customer’s severe misbehaviour demands a greater effort from the employee, whereas if the customer’s misbehaviour is less severe, the effectiveness of the employee’s effort significantly decreases, such that a moderate, but never low, level of effort by the employee is required. The effect of employee effort is explained by other customers’ justice perceptions. In addition, the service context in which the customer misbehaviour occurs also determines the effectiveness of customer misbehaviour. Implications and opportunities for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rummelhagen, Katja & Benkenstein, Martin, 2019. "When Service Employees Should Not Go the Extra Mile: The Interaction Between Perceived Employee Effort and Customer Misbehaviour Severity," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 3(1), pages 37-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:nomsmr:10.15358/2511-8676-2019-1-37
    DOI: 10.15358/2511-8676-2019-1-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.15358/2511-8676-2019-1-37
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15358/2511-8676-2019-1-37?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Jingya & Wang, Liangyan & Chan, Eugene, 2024. "When does anthropomorphism hurt? How tool anthropomorphism negatively affects consumers' rewards for tool users," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:nomsmr:10.15358/2511-8676-2019-1-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.