IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/ethics/10.5771-1439-880x-2017-2-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ordonomik als Methode zur Generierung von Überbietungsargumenten – Eine Illustration anhand der Flüchtlings(politik)debatte

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

Ordonomics is a method for the systematic generation of arguments that are capable of surpassing normative value judgements. Surpassing arguments can cure discourse failures - in the form of an orthogonal position to the mind-set of thinking in contested trade-offs. That is important for processes of societal (self-)governance via institutional reforms as well as for processes of societal (self-)enlightenment via reforms of idea(l)s.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo, 2017. "Ordonomik als Methode zur Generierung von Überbietungsargumenten – Eine Illustration anhand der Flüchtlings(politik)debatte," Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik - Journal for Business, Economics & Ethics, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 18(2), pages 171-200.
    • Handle: RePEc:nms:ethics:10.5771/1439-880x-2017-2-171
    DOI: 10.5771/1439-880X-2017-2-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/1439-880X-2017-2-171
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/1439-880X-2017-2-171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pies, Ingo, 2020. "Das Moralparadoxon der Moderne: Ordonomische Überlegungen zur modernen Ethik als Ethik der Moderne," Discussion Papers 2020-01, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:ethics:10.5771/1439-880x-2017-2-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.