Author
Abstract
The assessment of the basic pay is a problem that includes items of the working position ratings, items of the professional, qualificational and business qualities of the employees and workers, and items of the practice for determination of the basic pay by working positions and ranks of the qualification. These three items are functionally connected, and they are conditioned. In practice, any lack of correspondence and misunderstanding between them decreases the chance to motivate staff and diminishes the process of production in companies. This question is of present interest in the conditions of financial independence of manufacturers, especially in the conditions of a competitive labour and commodity market, where the functioning of the market mechanisms demand and necessitate the use of totally new forms and means, as for the Bulgarian companies. In this connection, this state has a specific purpose – to point out the most appropriate means of co-ordination to achieve this combination. From this point of view, the author's endeavour is orientated firstly to the thorough analysis and demonstration of the basic pay's role; as well asto the thorough analysis of the means to achieve the most consummate and progressive organization of the labour and system for managing personnel. According to the author, these are the affirmative analytical systems for working duties estimation, that are developed on the basis of precise duty records, on the basis of contemporary systems for attestation of the employees, as well as on the basis of the most modern tables (scales) for determination of the basic pays.
Suggested Citation
Georgi Georgiev, 2007.
"The Basic Pay A Unity Of Ratings And Stimuli,"
Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 3(2), pages 9-21.
Handle:
RePEc:neo:journl:v:3:y:2007:i:2:p:9-21
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:neo:journl:v:3:y:2007:i:2:p:9-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vladislav Krastev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feswubg.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.