Author
Abstract
In the present paper the economic and social significance of tourism are described in brief. It is also dealt with the social needs of the people regarding tourism– what causes them and how tourism assists in their satisfying. For the purposes of this presentation (and my future work, too) a pilot research has been conducted, representing an inquiry of arbitrary interlocutors and collecting oral information through informal conversations (without preliminary set questions). The main purpose of the research has been to find out which the most preferred places for recreation are, what the recreation in itself is, what type of tourism is most often practiced; what the expenses are; and whether people are ready to visit, being provided with the appropriate conditions, the pointed region in the Rodopi municipality, the village of Parvenets, the village of Hrabrino, the village of Boykovo, the village of Sitovo and the village of Lilkovo. The inquiry contents has been directed to those particular villages, and it has been conducted in those places, as well as in Plovdiv. Besides, there has been inquiries and observations on the Bulgarian seaside (mainly in Nesebar, Ravda, Aytos). Such conversations have been also lead in the Rodopi municipality. There follows a brief presentation of the obtained information and its short analysis. Here are the results in general: 1. Most of the inquired know the region, and part of them have visited it. The majority of the visitors own there villas or country houses. 2. The different age groups spend their leisure time engaged in different activities, and the greater variety of activities is observed within the group between the 36 and 50 years of age. 3. The weekend tourism is getting more and more preferred because of shortage of time and funds. 4. In a large part of the trips own transport is used. Depending on the place and conditions of recreation, the preferences regarding accommodation and meal differ. In the pointed region the private property sites (home – like) are preferred, and on the seaside – the hotels and restaurants, but to some extent here also it observed a certain withdrawal from hotel because of the too high prices. 5. The main obstacle for the growth of the rural and near-the-city tourism in the region is the infrastructure, and its improvement now is in process.
Suggested Citation
Ivan Kilimperov, 2005.
"The Connection Between Free Time And Near-The-City Tourism (E.G. Plovdiv),"
Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 1(4), pages 139-141.
Handle:
RePEc:neo:journl:v:1:y:2005:i:4:p:139-141
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:neo:journl:v:1:y:2005:i:4:p:139-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vladislav Krastev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feswubg.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.