IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nec/raestu/v94y2013i03p273-302_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does land fragmentation affect land productivity? Empirical evidence from Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Boliari, Natalia

Abstract

Land fragmentation is considered a major obstacle to the efficient use of land and other agricultural resources in Bulgaria. This study is concerned with formally testing the relationship between fragmentation of land plots and land productivity in the country. Multiple regression analysis and agricultural data obtained from the 2003 Bulgaria Multi-topic Household Survey is employed for the purpose. Results of the study suggest that the level of current fragmentation is relatively low and not likely to adversely affect land productivity. Other conditions being equal, therefore, land consolidation may not lead to any significant improvement in productivity in Bulgaria.

Suggested Citation

  • Boliari, Natalia, 2013. "Does land fragmentation affect land productivity? Empirical evidence from Bulgaria," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 94(03), pages 273-302, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:nec:raestu:v:94:y:2013:i:03:p:273-302_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.necplus.eu/abstract_S1966960713003019
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Plamena Yovchevska & Mihaela Mihailova & Nina Koteva, 2022. "Land Use in Bulgarian Agricultural Holdings and the Common Agricultural Policy," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 145-165.
    2. Natalia Boliari, 2017. "Can Partible Inheritance Explain Land Fragmentation? The Case of Bulgaria," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 6(3), pages 334-353, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nec:raestu:v:94:y:2013:i:03:p:273-302_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Louis Soubret (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.necplus.eu/jid_RAEProvider-Email:jlsoubret@necplus.eu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.