IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2017i36p107-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual Capital of Russian Companies as a Driver of Reducing the Cost of Debt

Author

Listed:
  • Teplova, T.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

  • Sokolova, T.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

  • Teplov, A.

    (State University of Management, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

In the 21st century intellectual capital (IC) is considered as a source of competitive advantages and as a factor increasing the enterprise value. The question about the significance of IC for reducing the cost of debt in the Russian market is still open. Our paper is devoted to the identification of the process and innovative IC indicators signalizing financial benefits. We consider the transparent and market element of debt - corporate bonds outstanding. The sample consists of 299 observations on 93 Russian companies of the non-financial sector in the period from 2010 to 2015. We use the method of regression analysis on the unbalanced panel. Our empirical research showed that firms have an opportunity to reduce the cost of debt by increasing elements of IC. IC elements affect the cost of publicly traded debt differently. The following factors have a significant impact on bond yields: indicators of intangible assets, R and D expenses, the composition of a team of managers, the size of the Board of directors. Possession of intangible assets and an increase in the number of patents raises yields of quoted corporate bonds. Existence of R and D for Russian companies is a positive signal for creditors - yields of corporate bonds decline. The original conclusion of our study - sole executive body leads to an increase in the cost of public debt. The greater size of the Board of directors contributes to the development of a balanced strategy and is recognized by market investors: yields of outstanding corporate bonds become lower.

Suggested Citation

  • Teplova, T. & Sokolova, T. & Teplov, A., 2017. "Intellectual Capital of Russian Companies as a Driver of Reducing the Cost of Debt," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 36(4), pages 107-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2017:i:36:p:107-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2017-36-107-134r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafiu Oyesola Salawu & Akinlolu Ayodeji Agboola, 2008. "The Determinants Of Capital Structure Of Large Non-Financial Listed Firms In Nigeria," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 2(2), pages 75-84.
    2. Bronwyn H. Hall & Adam Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2005. "Market Value and Patent Citations," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(1), pages 16-38, Spring.
    3. Demeulemeester, Sarah & Hottenrott, Hanna, 2015. "R&D subsidies and firms' cost of debt," DICE Discussion Papers 201, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    4. Ashbaugh-Skaife, Hollis & Collins, Daniel W. & LaFond, Ryan, 2006. "The effects of corporate governance on firms' credit ratings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 203-243, October.
    5. Chaoshin Chiao, 2002. "Relationship between debt, R&D and physical investment, evidence from US firm-level data," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 105-121.
    6. Anderson, Ronald C. & Mansi, Sattar A. & Reeb, David M., 2004. "Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 315-342, September.
    7. George Emmanuel Iatridis & Daniel Senftlechner, 2014. "An Empirical Investigation of Goodwill in Austria: Evidence on Management Change and Cost of Capital," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(2), pages 171-181, June.
    8. Boujelbene, Mohamed, 2013. "The impact of intellectual capital disclosure on cost of equity capital: A case of French firms," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Universidad ESAN, vol. 18(34), pages 45-53.
    9. Baruch Lev & Theodore Sougiannis, 1999. "Penetrating the Book-to-Market Black Box: The R&D Effect," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3-4), pages 419-449.
    10. Mr. Daniel Garcia-Macia, 2017. "The Financing of Ideas and the Great Deviation," IMF Working Papers 2017/176, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Carmen Lorca & Juan Sánchez-Ballesta & Emma García-Meca, 2011. "Board Effectiveness and Cost of Debt," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(4), pages 613-631, June.
    12. Júlio Martins & Sandra Alves, 2010. "The Impact Of Intangible Assets On Financial And Governance Policies: A Literature Review," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(1), pages 87-107.
    13. Qiao Liu & Kit Pong Wong, 2011. "Intellectual Capital and Financing Decisions: Evidence from the U.S. Patent Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(10), pages 1861-1878, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teplova, Tamara V. & Sokolova, Tatiana V., 2019. "Surprises of corporate governance and Russian firms debt," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 39-56.
    2. Ghouma, Hatem & Ben-Nasr, Hamdi & Yan, Ruiqian, 2018. "Corporate governance and cost of debt financing: Empirical evidence from Canada," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 138-148.
    3. Anastasia N. Stepanova & Olga O. Kopyrina, 2019. "The Influence Of Ownership Structure And Board Independence On The Cost Of Debt In Bric Countries," HSE Working papers WP BRP 74/FE/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Qian Long Kweh & Irene Wei Kiong Ting & Hanh Thi My Le & Mohammad Nourani, 2021. "Nonlinear impacts of board independence on debt financing: Contingent on the shareholdings of the largest shareholder," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 2289-2306, April.
    5. Redhwan Al‐Dhamari & Abdulsalam Saad Alquhaif & Bakr Ali Al‐Gamrh, 2022. "Modelling the impact of audit/remuneration committee overlap on debtholders' perceptions of accounting information quality: The role of CEO power," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 2898-2920, July.
    6. Adilah Azhari* & Hanita Kadir, 2018. "The Effects of Liquidity, Profitability and Board Characteristics on Debt Restructuring Likelihood Among Malaysian GLCs," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 942-950:6.
    7. ManYing Kang & Marcel Ausloos, 2017. "An Inverse Problem Study: Credit Risk Ratings as a Determinant of Corporate Governance and Capital Structure in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Aman, Hiroyuki & Nguyen, Pascal, 2013. "Does good governance matter to debtholders? Evidence from the credit ratings of Japanese firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-34.
    9. Ormazabal, Gaizka, 2018. "The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research," CEPR Discussion Papers 12775, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Gelter, Martin & Siems, Mathias, 2024. "Elective corporate governance: Does board choice matter?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Takanori Tanaka, 2014. "Gender diversity in the boards and the pricing of publicly traded corporate debt: evidence from Japan," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 247-258, February.
    12. Taruntej Singh Arora, 2020. "Impact of Corporate Governance on Credit Ratings: An Empirical Study in the Indian Context," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 13(2), pages 140-164, December.
    13. Dan Yang & Linyin Cheng & Guojun Wang & Yuetang Wang & Lu Zhang, 2020. "Investor protection and cost of debt: Evidence from dividend commitment in firm bylaws," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 294-308, September.
    14. Zhao, Qiuhong & Ziebart, David A., 2015. "SOX and bondholders' reliance on monitors," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 129-137.
    15. Owusu, Andrews & Kwabi, Frank & Owusu-Mensah, Ruth & Elamer, Ahmed A, 2023. "Lead independent director, managerial risk-taking, and cost of debt: Evidence from UK," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    16. Joni, Joni & Ahmed, Kamran & Hamilton, Jane, 2020. "Politically connected boards, family and business group affiliations, and cost of capital: Evidence from Indonesia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    17. Jara, Mauricio & López-Iturriaga, Félix & San Martín, Pablo & Saona, Paolo & Tenderini, Giannina, 2019. "Chilean pension fund managers and corporate governance: The impact on corporate debt," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 321-337.
    18. Ling Chu & Robert Mathieu & Chima Mbagwu, 2009. "The Impact of Corporate Governance and Audit Quality on the Cost of Private Loans," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 277-304, November.
    19. Bill Francis & Iftekhar Hasan & Qiang Wu, 2015. "Professors in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Corporate Governance and Firm Performance," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(3), pages 547-581, September.
    20. Xue, Fei & Wang, Xin & Xie, Yan & Zhang, Weihua, 2022. "Does CEO's early life experience affect corporate bond yield spread? Evidence from China's great famine," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1012-1024.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intellectual capital; intangible assets; cost of debt; ruble corporate bonds; bond yield to maturity (YTM);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2017:i:36:p:107-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.