IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2014i24p210-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Theory to Practice of Economic Regulation: Ten Theses on the Draft "Law on Culture"

Author

Listed:
  • Rubinshtein, A.

    (Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Ohe paper proposes the concept of economic regulation in the sphere of culture, representing combination of four main institutions: institution of differentiated budget performance standards, that characterize the minimum share of spending on culture in the budgets of all levels that enforce to ensure compliance with state obligations to consumers of cultural goods and cultural workers; institution of individual budget allocations ("percentage philanthropy"), which provides a direct participation of citizens in budget allocation, choosing areas of spending of a small part of the state income tax; institution of marked taxes, providing a direct referral into the cultural sphere of revenues from specific taxes and fees; institute of endowment funds, allowing to accumulate revenues from marked taxes and individual budget allocations, in order to derive an increasing current income from the endowment going to support cultural activities in the form of competitive grant funding. The proposed system of economic regulation of cultural activities can be seen as a model for all kinds of patronized goods. With a certain adaptation to the specific conditions of the functioning of science, education and health care, it can be the basis for appropriate institutional reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Rubinshtein, A., 2014. "From Theory to Practice of Economic Regulation: Ten Theses on the Draft "Law on Culture"," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 24(4), pages 210-217.
  • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2014:i:24:p:210-217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2014-24-210-217r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khaunina, E., 2012. "Percentage Philanthropy as Additional Financial Resource for Social and Cultural Sphere," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 141-143.
    2. Rubinshtein, A., 2010. "Instead of a Conclusion," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 6, pages 163-164.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Вступительная Заметка [Introductory Note]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2014:4, Institute of Economics.
    2. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "От Теории К Практике Экономического Регулирования: Десять Тезисов К Проекту Закона О Культуре [From Theory to Practice of Economic Regulation: Ten Theses on the Draft “Law on Culture]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2014:3, Institute of Economics.
    3. Rubinstein, A., 2015. "Economic Crisis and the New Paradigm of Public Support of the Patronized Goods," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 264-269.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    culture; patronized goods; budget performance standards; tax protectionism; institution of individual budget allocations; percentage philanthropy; marked taxes; endowment funds;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • P35 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Public Finance
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2014:i:24:p:210-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.