Author
Listed:
- Eric W. Wolff
(University of Cambridge)
- Robert Mulvaney
(British Antarctic Survey)
- Mackenzie M. Grieman
(University of Cambridge)
- Helene M. Hoffmann
(University of Cambridge
University of Tübingen)
- Jack Humby
(British Antarctic Survey)
- Christoph Nehrbass-Ahles
(University of Cambridge
National Physical Laboratory)
- Rachael H. Rhodes
(University of Cambridge)
- Isobel F. Rowell
(University of Cambridge
British Antarctic Survey)
- Louise C. Sime
(University of Cambridge)
- Hubertus Fischer
(University of Bern)
- Thomas F. Stocker
(University of Bern)
- Amaelle Landais
(Université Paris-Saclay)
- Frédéric Parrenin
(CNRS, INRAE, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE)
- Eric J. Steig
(University of Washington)
- Marina Dütsch
(University of Vienna)
- Nicholas R. Golledge
(Victoria University of Wellington)
Abstract
The fate of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS)1 is the largest cause of uncertainty in long-term sea-level projections. In the last interglacial (LIG) around 125,000 years ago, data suggest that sea level was several metres higher than today2–4, and required a significant contribution from Antarctic ice loss, with WAIS usually implicated. Antarctica and the Southern Ocean were warmer than today5–8, by amounts comparable to those expected by 2100 under moderate to high future warming scenarios. However, direct evidence about the size of WAIS in the LIG is sparse. Here we use sea salt data from an ice core from Skytrain Ice Rise, adjacent to WAIS, to show that, during most of the LIG, the Ronne Ice Shelf was still in place, and close to its current extent. Water isotope data are consistent with a retreat of WAIS9, but seem inconsistent with more dramatic model realizations10 in which both WAIS and the large Antarctic ice shelves were lost. This new constraint calls for a reappraisal of other elements of the LIG sea-level budget. It also weakens the observational basis that motivated model simulations projecting the highest end of projections for future rates of sea-level rise to 2300 and beyond.
Suggested Citation
Eric W. Wolff & Robert Mulvaney & Mackenzie M. Grieman & Helene M. Hoffmann & Jack Humby & Christoph Nehrbass-Ahles & Rachael H. Rhodes & Isobel F. Rowell & Louise C. Sime & Hubertus Fischer & Thomas , 2025.
"The Ronne Ice Shelf survived the last interglacial,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 638(8049), pages 133-137, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:638:y:2025:i:8049:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08394-w
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08394-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:638:y:2025:i:8049:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08394-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.