Author
Listed:
- Gabe S. Sonke
(Netherlands Cancer Institute)
- Annemiek Ommen-Nijhof
(Netherlands Cancer Institute)
- Noor Wortelboer
(Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute)
- Vincent Noort
(Netherlands Cancer Institute)
- Astrid C. P. Swinkels
(Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation)
- Hedwig M. Blommestein
(Erasmus University Rotterdam)
- Cristina Guerrero Paez
(Dutch Breast Cancer Society)
- Linda Mol
(Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation)
- Aart Beeker
(Spaarne Gasthuis)
- Karin Beelen
(Rijnstate Hospital)
- Lisanne C. Hamming
(Medical Center Leeuwarden)
- Joan B. Heijns
(Amphia)
- Aafke H. Honkoop
(Isala Clinics)
- Paul C. Jong
(St Antonius Hospital)
- Quirine C. Rossum-Schornagel
(Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland)
- Christa Schaik-van de Mheen
(Meander Medical Center)
- Jolien Tol
(Jeroen Bosch Hospital)
- Cathrien S. Tromp-van Driel
(Gelre Hospital)
- Suzan Vrijaldenhoven
(Northwest Hospital Group)
- A. Elise Leeuwen-Stok
(BOOG Study Center)
- Inge R. Konings
(Cancer Center Amsterdam)
- Agnes Jager
(Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute)
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy improve the outcomes of patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and can be used early as first-line treatment or deferred to second-line treatment1–7. Randomized data comparing the use of CDK4/6i in the first- and second-line setting are lacking. The phase 3 SONIA trial (NCT03425838) randomized 1,050 patients who had not received previous therapy for advanced breast cancer to receive CDK4/6i in the first- or second-line setting8. All of the patients received the same endocrine therapy, consisting of an aromatase inhibitor for first-line treatment and fulvestrant for second-line treatment. The primary end point was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression after second-line treatment (progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)). We observed no statistically significant benefit for the use of CDK4/6i as a first-line compared with second-line treatment (median, 31.0 versus 26.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.74–1.03; P = 0.10). The health-related quality of life was similar in both groups. First-line CDK4/6i use was associated with a longer CDK4/6i treatment duration compared with second-line use (median CDK4/6i treatment duration of 24.6 versus 8.1 months, respectively) and more grade ≥3 adverse events (2,763 versus 1,591, respectively). These data challenge the need for first-line use of a CDK4/6i in all patients.
Suggested Citation
Gabe S. Sonke & Annemiek Ommen-Nijhof & Noor Wortelboer & Vincent Noort & Astrid C. P. Swinkels & Hedwig M. Blommestein & Cristina Guerrero Paez & Linda Mol & Aart Beeker & Karin Beelen & Lisanne C. H, 2024.
"Early versus deferred use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 636(8042), pages 474-480, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:636:y:2024:i:8042:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08035-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08035-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:636:y:2024:i:8042:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08035-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.