IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v635y2024i8040d10.1038_s41586-024-08128-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clonal dynamics after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Spencer Chapman

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute
    Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre
    University of Cambridge)

  • C. Matthias Wilk

    (University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich)

  • Steffen Boettcher

    (University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich)

  • Emily Mitchell

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute
    Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre
    University of Cambridge)

  • Kevin Dawson

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute)

  • Nicholas Williams

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute)

  • Jan Müller

    (University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich)

  • Larisa Kovtonyuk

    (University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich)

  • Hyunchul Jung

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute)

  • Francisco Caiado

    (University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich)

  • Kirsty Roberts

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute)

  • Laura O’Neill

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute)

  • David G. Kent

    (Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre
    University of Cambridge
    Wentworth Way)

  • Anthony R. Green

    (Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre
    University of Cambridge)

  • Jyoti Nangalia

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute
    Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre
    University of Cambridge)

  • Markus G. Manz

    (University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich)

  • Peter J. Campbell

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute
    Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre
    University of Cambridge)

Abstract

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) replaces the stem cells responsible for blood production with those from a donor1,2. Here, to quantify dynamics of long-term stem cell engraftment, we sequenced genomes from 2,824 single-cell-derived haematopoietic colonies of ten donor–recipient pairs taken 9–31 years after HLA-matched sibling HCT3. With younger donors (18–47 years at transplant), 5,000–30,000 stem cells had engrafted and were still contributing to haematopoiesis at the time of sampling; estimates were tenfold lower with older donors (50–66 years). Engrafted cells made multilineage contributions to myeloid, B lymphoid and T lymphoid populations, although individual clones often showed biases towards one or other mature cell type. Recipients had lower clonal diversity than matched donors, equivalent to around 10–15 years of additional ageing, arising from up to 25-fold greater expansion of stem cell clones. A transplant-related population bottleneck could not explain these differences; instead, phylogenetic trees evinced two distinct modes of HCT-specific selection. In pruning selection, cell divisions underpinning recipient-enriched clonal expansions had occurred in the donor, preceding transplant—their selective advantage derived from preferential mobilization, collection, survival ex vivo or initial homing. In growth selection, cell divisions underpinning clonal expansion occurred in the recipient’s marrow after engraftment, most pronounced in clones with multiple driver mutations. Uprooting stem cells from their native environment and transplanting them to foreign soil exaggerates selective pressures, distorting and accelerating the loss of clonal diversity compared to the unperturbed haematopoiesis of donors.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Spencer Chapman & C. Matthias Wilk & Steffen Boettcher & Emily Mitchell & Kevin Dawson & Nicholas Williams & Jan Müller & Larisa Kovtonyuk & Hyunchul Jung & Francisco Caiado & Kirsty Roberts &, 2024. "Clonal dynamics after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation," Nature, Nature, vol. 635(8040), pages 926-934, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:635:y:2024:i:8040:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08128-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08128-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08128-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-08128-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:635:y:2024:i:8040:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08128-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.