IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v634y2024i8035d10.1038_s41586-024-08050-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from plant carbonyl sulfide uptake

Author

Listed:
  • Jiameng Lai

    (Cornell University)

  • Linda M. J. Kooijmans

    (Wageningen University and Research)

  • Wu Sun

    (Carnegie Institution for Science)

  • Danica Lombardozzi

    (Colorado State University)

  • J. Elliott Campbell

    (University of California, Santa Cruz)

  • Lianhong Gu

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Yiqi Luo

    (Cornell University)

  • Le Kuai

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Ying Sun

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

Terrestrial photosynthesis, or gross primary production (GPP), is the largest carbon flux in the biosphere, but its global magnitude and spatiotemporal dynamics remain uncertain1. The global annual mean GPP is historically thought to be around 120 PgC yr−1 (refs. 2–6), which is about 30–50 PgC yr−1 lower than GPP inferred from the oxygen-18 (18O) isotope7 and soil respiration8. This disparity is a source of uncertainty in predicting climate–carbon cycle feedbacks9,10. Here we infer GPP from carbonyl sulfide, an innovative tracer for CO2 diffusion from ambient air to leaf chloroplasts through stomata and mesophyll layers. We demonstrate that explicitly representing mesophyll diffusion is important for accurately quantifying the spatiotemporal dynamics of carbonyl sulfide uptake by plants. From the estimate of carbonyl sulfide uptake by plants, we infer a global contemporary GPP of 157 (±8.5) PgC yr−1, which is consistent with estimates from 18O (150–175 PgC yr−1) and soil respiration ( $${149}_{-23}^{+29}$$ 149 − 23 + 29 PgC yr−1), but with an improved confidence level. Our global GPP is higher than satellite optical observation-driven estimates (120–140 PgC yr–1) that are used for Earth system model benchmarking. This difference predominantly occurs in the pan-tropical rainforests and is corroborated by ground measurements11, suggesting a more productive tropics than satellite-based GPP products indicated. As GPP is a primary determinant of terrestrial carbon sinks and may shape climate trajectories9,10, our findings lay a physiological foundation on which the understanding and prediction of carbon–climate feedbacks can be advanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiameng Lai & Linda M. J. Kooijmans & Wu Sun & Danica Lombardozzi & J. Elliott Campbell & Lianhong Gu & Yiqi Luo & Le Kuai & Ying Sun, 2024. "Terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from plant carbonyl sulfide uptake," Nature, Nature, vol. 634(8035), pages 855-861, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8035:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08050-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08050-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08050-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-08050-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8035:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08050-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.