Author
Listed:
- Neil M. Davies
(University College London
University College London
Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
- Gibran Hemani
(University of Bristol
University of Bristol)
- Jenae M. Neiderhiser
(The Pennsylvania State University)
- Hilary C. Martin
(Wellcome Genome Campus)
- Melinda C. Mills
(University of Groningen
University Medical Centre Groningen
University of Oxford)
- Peter M. Visscher
(The University of Queensland
University of Oxford)
- Loïc Yengo
(The University of Queensland)
- Alexander Strudwick Young
(UCLA Anderson School of Management
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine)
- Matthew C. Keller
(University of Colorado at Boulder
University of Colorado at Boulder)
Abstract
Biobanks aim to improve our understanding of health and disease by collecting and analysing diverse biological and phenotypic information in large samples. So far, biobanks have largely pursued a population-based sampling strategy, where the individual is the unit of sampling, and familial relatedness occurs sporadically and by chance. This strategy has been remarkably efficient and successful, leading to thousands of scientific discoveries across multiple research domains, and plans for the next wave of biobanks are underway. In this Perspective, we discuss the strengths and limitations of a complementary sampling strategy for future biobanks based on oversampling of close genetic relatives. Such family-based samples facilitate research that clarifies causal relationships between putative risk factors and outcomes, particularly in estimates of genetic effects, because they enable analyses that reduce or eliminate confounding due to familial and demographic factors. Family-based biobank samples would also shed new light on fundamental questions across multiple fields that are often difficult to explore in population-based samples. Despite the potential for higher costs and greater analytical complexity, the many advantages of family-based samples should often outweigh their potential challenges.
Suggested Citation
Neil M. Davies & Gibran Hemani & Jenae M. Neiderhiser & Hilary C. Martin & Melinda C. Mills & Peter M. Visscher & Loïc Yengo & Alexander Strudwick Young & Matthew C. Keller, 2024.
"The importance of family-based sampling for biobanks,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 634(8035), pages 795-803, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8035:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07721-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07721-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8035:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07721-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.