Author
Listed:
- Andrea Di Francesco
(Calico Life Sciences LLC)
- Andrew G. Deighan
(The Jackson Laboratory)
- Lev Litichevskiy
(University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania)
- Zhenghao Chen
(Calico Life Sciences LLC)
- Alison Luciano
(The Jackson Laboratory)
- Laura Robinson
(The Jackson Laboratory)
- Gaven Garland
(The Jackson Laboratory)
- Hannah Donato
(The Jackson Laboratory)
- Matthew Vincent
(The Jackson Laboratory)
- Will Schott
(The Jackson Laboratory)
- Kevin M. Wright
(Calico Life Sciences LLC
Actio Biosciences)
- Anil Raj
(Calico Life Sciences LLC)
- G. V. Prateek
(Calico Life Sciences LLC)
- Martin Mullis
(Calico Life Sciences LLC)
- Warren G. Hill
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School)
- Mark L. Zeidel
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School)
- Luanne L. Peters
(The Jackson Laboratory)
- Fiona Harding
(Calico Life Sciences LLC)
- David Botstein
(Calico Life Sciences LLC)
- Ron Korstanje
(The Jackson Laboratory)
- Christoph A. Thaiss
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Adam Freund
(Calico Life Sciences LLC
Arda Therapeutics)
- Gary A. Churchill
(The Jackson Laboratory)
Abstract
Caloric restriction extends healthy lifespan in multiple species1. Intermittent fasting, an alternative form of dietary restriction, is potentially more sustainable in humans, but its effectiveness remains largely unexplored2–8. Identifying the most efficacious forms of dietary restriction is key for developing interventions to improve human health and longevity9. Here we performed an extensive assessment of graded levels of caloric restriction (20% and 40%) and intermittent fasting (1 and 2 days fasting per week) on the health and survival of 960 genetically diverse female mice. We show that caloric restriction and intermittent fasting both resulted in lifespan extension in proportion to the degree of restriction. Lifespan was heritable and genetics had a larger influence on lifespan than dietary restriction. The strongest trait associations with lifespan included retention of body weight through periods of handling—an indicator of stress resilience, high lymphocyte proportion, low red blood cell distribution width and high adiposity in late life. Health effects differed between interventions and exhibited inconsistent relationships with lifespan extension. 40% caloric restriction had the strongest lifespan extension effect but led to a loss of lean mass and changes in the immune repertoire that could confer susceptibility to infections. Intermittent fasting did not extend the lifespan of mice with high pre-intervention body weight, and two-day intermittent fasting was associated with disruption of erythroid cell populations. Metabolic responses to dietary restriction, including reduced adiposity and lower fasting glucose, were not associated with increased lifespan, suggesting that dietary restriction does more than just counteract the negative effects of obesity. Our findings indicate that improving health and extending lifespan are not synonymous and raise questions about which end points are the most relevant for evaluating aging interventions in preclinical models and clinical trials.
Suggested Citation
Andrea Di Francesco & Andrew G. Deighan & Lev Litichevskiy & Zhenghao Chen & Alison Luciano & Laura Robinson & Gaven Garland & Hannah Donato & Matthew Vincent & Will Schott & Kevin M. Wright & Anil Ra, 2024.
"Dietary restriction impacts health and lifespan of genetically diverse mice,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 634(8034), pages 684-692, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8034:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08026-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08026-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8034:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08026-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.