Author
Listed:
- Laurie Cazalé-Debat
(University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham)
- Lisa Scheunemann
(Institute of Biology
corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin)
- Megan Day
(University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham)
- Tania Fernandez-d.V. Alquicira
(corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin)
- Anna Dimtsi
(University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham
Newcastle University)
- Youchong Zhang
(University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham
University of Oxford)
- Lauren A. Blackburn
(University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham
University of Worcester)
- Charles Ballardini
(University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham)
- Katie Greenin-Whitehead
(University of Sheffield
University of Sheffield)
- Eric Reynolds
(corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin)
- Andrew C. Lin
(University of Sheffield
University of Sheffield)
- David Owald
(corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin)
- Carolina Rezaval
(University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham)
Abstract
Romantic engagement can bias sensory perception. This ‘love blindness’ reflects a common behavioural principle across organisms: favouring pursuit of a coveted reward over potential risks1. In the case of animal courtship, such sensory biases may support reproductive success but can also expose individuals to danger, such as predation2,3. However, how neural networks balance the trade-off between risk and reward is unknown. Here we discover a dopamine-governed filter mechanism in male Drosophila that reduces threat perception as courtship progresses. We show that during early courtship stages, threat-activated visual neurons inhibit central courtship nodes via specific serotonergic neurons. This serotonergic inhibition prompts flies to abort courtship when they see imminent danger. However, as flies advance in the courtship process, the dopaminergic filter system reduces visual threat responses, shifting the balance from survival to mating. By recording neural activity from males as they approach mating, we demonstrate that progress in courtship is registered as dopaminergic activity levels ramping up. This dopamine signalling inhibits the visual threat detection pathway via Dop2R receptors, allowing male flies to focus on courtship when they are close to copulation. Thus, dopamine signalling biases sensory perception based on perceived goal proximity, to prioritize between competing behaviours.
Suggested Citation
Laurie Cazalé-Debat & Lisa Scheunemann & Megan Day & Tania Fernandez-d.V. Alquicira & Anna Dimtsi & Youchong Zhang & Lauren A. Blackburn & Charles Ballardini & Katie Greenin-Whitehead & Eric Reynolds , 2024.
"Mating proximity blinds threat perception,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 634(8034), pages 635-643, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8034:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07890-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07890-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:634:y:2024:i:8034:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07890-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.