Author
Listed:
- Chong Chen
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
- Jesse K. Niehaus
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
- Fatih Dinc
(Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Karen L. Huang
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
- Alexander L. Barnette
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
- Adrien Tassou
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
- S. Andrew Shuster
(Harvard Medical School)
- Lihua Wang
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute)
- Andrew Lemire
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute)
- Vilas Menon
(Columbia University)
- Kimberly Ritola
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
- Adam W. Hantman
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
- Hongkui Zeng
(Allen Institute for Brain Science)
- Mark J. Schnitzer
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Grégory Scherrer
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Abstract
Placebo effects are notable demonstrations of mind–body interactions1,2. During pain perception, in the absence of any treatment, an expectation of pain relief can reduce the experience of pain—a phenomenon known as placebo analgesia3–6. However, despite the strength of placebo effects and their impact on everyday human experience and the failure of clinical trials for new therapeutics7, the neural circuit basis of placebo effects has remained unclear. Here we show that analgesia from the expectation of pain relief is mediated by rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) neurons that project to the pontine nucleus (rACC→Pn)—a precerebellar nucleus with no established function in pain. We created a behavioural assay that generates placebo-like anticipatory pain relief in mice. In vivo calcium imaging of neural activity and electrophysiological recordings in brain slices showed that expectations of pain relief boost the activity of rACC→Pn neurons and potentiate neurotransmission in this pathway. Transcriptomic studies of Pn neurons revealed an abundance of opioid receptors, further suggesting a role in pain modulation. Inhibition of the rACC→Pn pathway disrupted placebo analgesia and decreased pain thresholds, whereas activation elicited analgesia in the absence of placebo conditioning. Finally, Purkinje cells exhibited activity patterns resembling those of rACC→Pn neurons during pain-relief expectation, providing cellular-level evidence for a role of the cerebellum in cognitive pain modulation. These findings open the possibility of targeting this prefrontal cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathway with drugs or neurostimulation to treat pain.
Suggested Citation
Chong Chen & Jesse K. Niehaus & Fatih Dinc & Karen L. Huang & Alexander L. Barnette & Adrien Tassou & S. Andrew Shuster & Lihua Wang & Andrew Lemire & Vilas Menon & Kimberly Ritola & Adam W. Hantman &, 2024.
"Neural circuit basis of placebo pain relief,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 632(8027), pages 1092-1100, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:632:y:2024:i:8027:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07816-z
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07816-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:632:y:2024:i:8027:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07816-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.