Author
Listed:
- Glyn A. Collinson
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
The Catholic University of America
Interplanetary Expeditions)
- Alex Glocer
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- Robert Pfaff
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- Aroh Barjatya
(Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University)
- Rachel Conway
(Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University)
- Aaron Breneman
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- James Clemmons
(University of New Hampshire)
- Francis Eparvier
(University of Colorado at Boulder)
- Robert Michell
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- David Mitchell
(University of California at Berkeley)
- Suzie Imber
(University of Leicester)
- Hassanali Akbari
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
The Catholic University of America)
- Lance Davis
(Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University)
- Andrew Kavanagh
(British Antarctic Survey)
- Ellen Robertson
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- Diana Swanson
(University of New Hampshire)
- Shaosui Xu
(University of California at Berkeley)
- Jacob Miller
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Penn State University)
- Timothy Cameron
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- Dennis Chornay
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- Paulo Uribe
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- Long Nguyen
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- Robert Clayton
(Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University)
- Nathan Graves
(Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University)
- Shantanab Debchoudhury
(Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University)
- Henry Valentine
(Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University)
- Ahmed Ghalib
(NASA Wallops Flight Facility)
Abstract
Cold plasma of ionospheric origin has recently been found to be a much larger contributor to the magnetosphere of Earth than expected1–3. Numerous competing mechanisms have been postulated to drive ion escape to space, including heating and acceleration by wave–particle interactions4 and a global electrostatic field between the ionosphere and space (called the ambipolar or polarization field)5,6. Observations of heated O+ ions in the magnetosphere are consistent with resonant wave–particle interactions7. By contrast, observations of cold supersonic H+ flowing out of the polar ionosphere8,9 (called the polar wind) suggest the presence of an electrostatic field. Here we report the existence of a +0.55 ± 0.09 V electric potential drop between 250 km and 768 km from a planetary electrostatic field (E∥⊕ = 1.09 ± 0.17 μV m−1) generated exclusively by the outward pressure of ionospheric electrons. We experimentally demonstrate that the ambipolar field of Earth controls the structure of the polar ionosphere, boosting the scale height by 271%. We infer that this increases the supply of cold O+ ions to the magnetosphere by more than 3,800%, in which other mechanisms such as wave–particle interactions can heat and further accelerate them to escape velocity. The electrostatic field of Earth is strong enough by itself to drive the polar wind9,10 and is probably the origin of the cold H+ ion population1 that dominates much of the magnetosphere2,3.
Suggested Citation
Glyn A. Collinson & Alex Glocer & Robert Pfaff & Aroh Barjatya & Rachel Conway & Aaron Breneman & James Clemmons & Francis Eparvier & Robert Michell & David Mitchell & Suzie Imber & Hassanali Akbari &, 2024.
"Earth’s ambipolar electrostatic field and its role in ion escape to space,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 632(8027), pages 1021-1025, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:632:y:2024:i:8027:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07480-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07480-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:632:y:2024:i:8027:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07480-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.