IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v630y2024i8017d10.1038_s41586-024-07490-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strand-resolved mutagenicity of DNA damage and repair

Author

Listed:
  • Craig J. Anderson

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Lana Talmane

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Juliet Luft

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • John Connelly

    (University of Edinburgh
    University of Cambridge
    University of Edinburgh
    NHS Lothian)

  • Michael D. Nicholson

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Jan C. Verburg

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Oriol Pich

    (The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Susan Campbell

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Marco Giaisi

    (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ))

  • Pei-Chi Wei

    (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ))

  • Vasavi Sundaram

    (European Bioinformatics Institute)

  • Frances Connor

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Paul A. Ginno

    (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ))

  • Takayo Sasaki

    (San Diego Biomedical Research Institute)

  • David M. Gilbert

    (San Diego Biomedical Research Institute)

  • Núria López-Bigas

    (The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology
    Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)
    Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)
    Instituto de Salud Carlos III)

  • Colin A. Semple

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Duncan T. Odom

    (University of Cambridge
    German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ))

  • Sarah J. Aitken

    (University of Cambridge
    University of Cambridge
    University of Cambridge
    Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Martin S. Taylor

    (University of Edinburgh)

Abstract

DNA base damage is a major source of oncogenic mutations1. Such damage can produce strand-phased mutation patterns and multiallelic variation through the process of lesion segregation2. Here we exploited these properties to reveal how strand-asymmetric processes, such as replication and transcription, shape DNA damage and repair. Despite distinct mechanisms of leading and lagging strand replication3,4, we observe identical fidelity and damage tolerance for both strands. For small alkylation adducts of DNA, our results support a model in which the same translesion polymerase is recruited on-the-fly to both replication strands, starkly contrasting the strand asymmetric tolerance of bulky UV-induced adducts5. The accumulation of multiple distinct mutations at the site of persistent lesions provides the means to quantify the relative efficiency of repair processes genome wide and at single-base resolution. At multiple scales, we show DNA damage-induced mutations are largely shaped by the influence of DNA accessibility on repair efficiency, rather than gradients of DNA damage. Finally, we reveal specific genomic conditions that can actively drive oncogenic mutagenesis by corrupting the fidelity of nucleotide excision repair. These results provide insight into how strand-asymmetric mechanisms underlie the formation, tolerance and repair of DNA damage, thereby shaping cancer genome evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig J. Anderson & Lana Talmane & Juliet Luft & John Connelly & Michael D. Nicholson & Jan C. Verburg & Oriol Pich & Susan Campbell & Marco Giaisi & Pei-Chi Wei & Vasavi Sundaram & Frances Connor & P, 2024. "Strand-resolved mutagenicity of DNA damage and repair," Nature, Nature, vol. 630(8017), pages 744-751, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:630:y:2024:i:8017:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07490-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07490-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07490-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-07490-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:630:y:2024:i:8017:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07490-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.