IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v630y2024i8016d10.1038_s41586-024-07463-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The sex of organ geometry

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Blackie

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London
    The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Pedro Gaspar

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London
    The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Salem Mosleh

    (Harvard University
    University of Maryland Eastern Shore)

  • Oleh Lushchak

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences)

  • Lingjin Kong

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London)

  • Yuhong Jin

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London)

  • Agata P. Zielinska

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London)

  • Boxuan Cao

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London)

  • Alessandro Mineo

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London
    The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Bryon Silva

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London
    The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Tomotsune Ameku

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London
    The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Shu En Lim

    (University College London
    University College London)

  • Yanlan Mao

    (University College London
    University College London)

  • Lucía Prieto-Godino

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Todd Schoborg

    (University of Wyoming)

  • Marta Varela

    (Imperial College London)

  • L. Mahadevan

    (Harvard University
    Harvard University)

  • Irene Miguel-Aliaga

    (MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences
    Imperial College London
    The Francis Crick Institute)

Abstract

Organs have a distinctive yet often overlooked spatial arrangement in the body1–5. We propose that there is a logic to the shape of an organ and its proximity to its neighbours. Here, by using volumetric scans of many Drosophila melanogaster flies, we develop methods to quantify three-dimensional features of organ shape, position and interindividual variability. We find that both the shapes of organs and their relative arrangement are consistent yet differ between the sexes, and identify unexpected interorgan adjacencies and left–right organ asymmetries. Focusing on the intestine, which traverses the entire body, we investigate how sex differences in three-dimensional organ geometry arise. The configuration of the adult intestine is only partially determined by physical constraints imposed by adjacent organs; its sex-specific shape is actively maintained by mechanochemical crosstalk between gut muscles and vascular-like trachea. Indeed, sex-biased expression of a muscle-derived fibroblast growth factor-like ligand renders trachea sexually dimorphic. In turn, tracheal branches hold gut loops together into a male or female shape, with physiological consequences. Interorgan geometry represents a previously unrecognized level of biological complexity which might enable or confine communication across organs and could help explain sex or species differences in organ function.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Blackie & Pedro Gaspar & Salem Mosleh & Oleh Lushchak & Lingjin Kong & Yuhong Jin & Agata P. Zielinska & Boxuan Cao & Alessandro Mineo & Bryon Silva & Tomotsune Ameku & Shu En Lim & Yanlan Mao &, 2024. "The sex of organ geometry," Nature, Nature, vol. 630(8016), pages 392-400, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:630:y:2024:i:8016:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07463-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07463-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07463-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-07463-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:630:y:2024:i:8016:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07463-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.