IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v629y2024i8013d10.1038_s41586-024-07385-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computationally restoring the potency of a clinical antibody against Omicron

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas A. Desautels

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Kathryn T. Arrildt

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Adam T. Zemla

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Edmond Y. Lau

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Fangqiang Zhu

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Dante Ricci

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Stephanie Cronin

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Seth J. Zost

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Elad Binshtein

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Suzanne M. Scheaffer

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Bernadeta Dadonaite

    (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center)

  • Brenden K. Petersen

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Taylor B. Engdahl

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Elaine Chen

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Laura S. Handal

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Lynn Hall

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • John W. Goforth

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Denis Vashchenko

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Sam Nguyen

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
    Alphabet Inc.)

  • Dina R. Weilhammer

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Jacky Kai-Yin Lo

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Bonnee Rubinfeld

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Edwin A. Saada

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Tracy Weisenberger

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Tek-Hyung Lee

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Bradley Whitener

    (Washington University School of Medicine
    Vir Biotechnology)

  • James B. Case

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Alexander Ladd

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Mary S. Silva

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Rebecca M. Haluska

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Emilia A. Grzesiak

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Christopher G. Earnhart

    (US Department of Defense)

  • Svetlana Hopkins

    (Joint Rsearch and Development Inc.)

  • Thomas W. Bates

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Larissa B. Thackray

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Brent W. Segelke

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Antonietta Maria Lillo

    (Bioscience Division)

  • Shivshankar Sundaram

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Jesse D. Bloom

    (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

  • Michael S. Diamond

    (Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • James E. Crowe

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Robert H. Carnahan

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Daniel M. Faissol

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the promise of monoclonal antibody-based prophylactic and therapeutic drugs1–3 and revealed how quickly viral escape can curtail effective options4,5. When the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant emerged in 2021, many antibody drug products lost potency, including Evusheld and its constituent, cilgavimab4–6. Cilgavimab, like its progenitor COV2-2130, is a class 3 antibody that is compatible with other antibodies in combination4 and is challenging to replace with existing approaches. Rapidly modifying such high-value antibodies to restore efficacy against emerging variants is a compelling mitigation strategy. We sought to redesign and renew the efficacy of COV2-2130 against Omicron BA.1 and BA.1.1 strains while maintaining efficacy against the dominant Delta variant. Here we show that our computationally redesigned antibody, 2130-1-0114-112, achieves this objective, simultaneously increases neutralization potency against Delta and subsequent variants of concern, and provides protection in vivo against the strains tested: WA1/2020, BA.1.1 and BA.5. Deep mutational scanning of tens of thousands of pseudovirus variants reveals that 2130-1-0114-112 improves broad potency without increasing escape liabilities. Our results suggest that computational approaches can optimize an antibody to target multiple escape variants, while simultaneously enriching potency. Our computational approach does not require experimental iterations or pre-existing binding data, thus enabling rapid response strategies to address escape variants or lessen escape vulnerabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas A. Desautels & Kathryn T. Arrildt & Adam T. Zemla & Edmond Y. Lau & Fangqiang Zhu & Dante Ricci & Stephanie Cronin & Seth J. Zost & Elad Binshtein & Suzanne M. Scheaffer & Bernadeta Dadonaite &, 2024. "Computationally restoring the potency of a clinical antibody against Omicron," Nature, Nature, vol. 629(8013), pages 878-885, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:629:y:2024:i:8013:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07385-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07385-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07385-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-07385-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:629:y:2024:i:8013:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07385-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.