IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v627y2024i8002d10.1038_s41586-024-07083-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rainforest transformation reallocates energy from green to brown food webs

Author

Listed:
  • Anton M. Potapov

    (University of Göttingen
    German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
    University of Leipzig)

  • Jochen Drescher

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Kevin Darras

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Arne Wenzel

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Noah Janotta

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Rizky Nazarreta

    (IPB University)

  • Kasmiatun

    (IPB University)

  • Valentine Laurent

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Amanda Mawan

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Endah H. Utari

    (IPB University)

  • Melanie M. Pollierer

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Katja Rembold

    (University of Bern
    University of Göttingen)

  • Rahayu Widyastuti

    (IPB University)

  • Damayanti Buchori

    (IPB University
    IPB University)

  • Purnama Hidayat

    (IPB University)

  • Edgar Turner

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Ingo Grass

    (University of Hohenheim)

  • Catrin Westphal

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Teja Tscharntke

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Stefan Scheu

    (University of Göttingen
    University of Göttigen)

Abstract

Terrestrial animal biodiversity is increasingly being lost because of land-use change1,2. However, functional and energetic consequences aboveground and belowground and across trophic levels in megadiverse tropical ecosystems remain largely unknown. To fill this gap, we assessed changes in energy fluxes across ‘green’ aboveground (canopy arthropods and birds) and ‘brown’ belowground (soil arthropods and earthworms) animal food webs in tropical rainforests and plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia. Our results showed that most of the energy in rainforests is channelled to the belowground animal food web. Oil palm and rubber plantations had similar or, in the case of rubber agroforest, higher total animal energy fluxes compared to rainforest but the key energetic nodes were distinctly different: in rainforest more than 90% of the total animal energy flux was channelled by arthropods in soil and canopy, whereas in plantations more than 50% of the energy was allocated to annelids (earthworms). Land-use change led to a consistent decline in multitrophic energy flux aboveground, whereas belowground food webs responded with reduced energy flux to higher trophic levels, down to −90%, and with shifts from slow (fungal) to fast (bacterial) energy channels and from faeces production towards consumption of soil organic matter. This coincides with previously reported soil carbon stock depletion3. Here we show that well-documented animal biodiversity declines with tropical land-use change4–6 are associated with vast energetic and functional restructuring in food webs across aboveground and belowground ecosystem compartments.

Suggested Citation

  • Anton M. Potapov & Jochen Drescher & Kevin Darras & Arne Wenzel & Noah Janotta & Rizky Nazarreta & Kasmiatun & Valentine Laurent & Amanda Mawan & Endah H. Utari & Melanie M. Pollierer & Katja Rembold , 2024. "Rainforest transformation reallocates energy from green to brown food webs," Nature, Nature, vol. 627(8002), pages 116-122, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:627:y:2024:i:8002:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07083-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07083-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07083-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-07083-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:627:y:2024:i:8002:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07083-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.