IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v626y2024i8001d10.1038_s41586-024-07021-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying general reaction conditions by bandit optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Y. Wang

    (Princeton University
    University of California)

  • Jason M. Stevens

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Stavros K. Kariofillis

    (Princeton University
    University of California
    Columbia University)

  • Mai-Jan Tom

    (University of California)

  • Dung L. Golden

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Jun Li

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Jose E. Tabora

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Marvin Parasram

    (Princeton University
    New York University)

  • Benjamin J. Shields

    (Princeton University
    Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • David N. Primer

    (Bristol Myers Squibb
    Loxo Oncology at Lilly)

  • Bo Hao

    (Janssen Research and Development)

  • David Valle

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Stacey DiSomma

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Ariel Furman

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • G. Greg Zipp

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Sergey Melnikov

    (Spectrix Analytical Services)

  • James Paulson

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Abigail G. Doyle

    (Princeton University
    University of California)

Abstract

Reaction conditions that are generally applicable to a wide variety of substrates are highly desired, especially in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries1–6. Although many approaches are available to evaluate the general applicability of developed conditions, a universal approach to efficiently discover these conditions during optimizations is rare. Here we report the design, implementation and application of reinforcement learning bandit optimization models7–10 to identify generally applicable conditions by efficient condition sampling and evaluation of experimental feedback. Performance benchmarking on existing datasets statistically showed high accuracies for identifying general conditions, with up to 31% improvement over baselines that mimic state-of-the-art optimization approaches. A palladium-catalysed imidazole C–H arylation reaction, an aniline amide coupling reaction and a phenol alkylation reaction were investigated experimentally to evaluate use cases and functionalities of the bandit optimization model in practice. In all three cases, the reaction conditions that were most generally applicable yet not well studied for the respective reaction were identified after surveying less than 15% of the expert-designed reaction space.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Y. Wang & Jason M. Stevens & Stavros K. Kariofillis & Mai-Jan Tom & Dung L. Golden & Jun Li & Jose E. Tabora & Marvin Parasram & Benjamin J. Shields & David N. Primer & Bo Hao & David Valle & St, 2024. "Identifying general reaction conditions by bandit optimization," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(8001), pages 1025-1033, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:626:y:2024:i:8001:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07021-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07021-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07021-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-07021-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:626:y:2024:i:8001:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07021-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.