Author
Listed:
- Katherine McMahan
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Frank Wegmann
(Janssen Vaccines and Prevention)
- Malika Aid
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Michaela Sciacca
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Jinyan Liu
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Nicole P. Hachmann
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Jessica Miller
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Catherine Jacob-Dolan
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard)
- Olivia Powers
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- David Hope
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Cindy Wu
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Juliana Pereira
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Tetyana Murdza
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Camille R. Mazurek
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Amelia Hoyt
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
- Adrianus C. M. Boon
(Washington University School of Medicine)
- Meredith Davis-Gardner
(Emory School of Medicine)
- Mehul S. Suthar
(Emory School of Medicine)
- Amanda J. Martinot
(Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine)
- Mona Boursiquot
(Bioqual)
- Anthony Cook
(Bioqual)
- Laurent Pessaint
(Bioqual)
- Mark G. Lewis
(Bioqual)
- Hanne Andersen
(Bioqual)
- Jeroen Tolboom
(Janssen Vaccines and Prevention)
- Jan Serroyen
(Janssen Vaccines and Prevention)
- Laura Solforosi
(Janssen Vaccines and Prevention)
- Lea M. M. Costes
(Janssen Vaccines and Prevention)
- Roland C. Zahn
(Janssen Vaccines and Prevention)
- Dan H. Barouch
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard)
Abstract
A limitation of current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is that they provide minimal protection against infection with current Omicron subvariants1,2, although they still provide protection against severe disease. Enhanced mucosal immunity may be required to block infection and onward transmission. Intranasal administration of current vaccines has proven inconsistent3–7, suggesting that alternative immunization strategies may be required. Here we show that intratracheal boosting with a bivalent Ad26-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine results in substantial induction of mucosal humoral and cellular immunity and near-complete protection against SARS-CoV-2 BQ.1.1 challenge. A total of 40 previously immunized rhesus macaques were boosted with a bivalent Ad26 vaccine by the intramuscular, intranasal and intratracheal routes, or with a bivalent mRNA vaccine by the intranasal route. Ad26 boosting by the intratracheal route led to a substantial expansion of mucosal neutralizing antibodies, IgG and IgA binding antibodies, and CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses, which exceeded those induced by Ad26 boosting by the intramuscular and intranasal routes. Intratracheal Ad26 boosting also led to robust upregulation of cytokine, natural killer, and T and B cell pathways in the lungs. After challenge with a high dose of SARS-CoV-2 BQ.1.1, intratracheal Ad26 boosting provided near-complete protection, whereas the other boosting strategies proved less effective. Protective efficacy correlated best with mucosal humoral and cellular immune responses. These data demonstrate that these immunization strategies induce robust mucosal immunity, suggesting the feasibility of developing vaccines that block respiratory viral infections.
Suggested Citation
Katherine McMahan & Frank Wegmann & Malika Aid & Michaela Sciacca & Jinyan Liu & Nicole P. Hachmann & Jessica Miller & Catherine Jacob-Dolan & Olivia Powers & David Hope & Cindy Wu & Juliana Pereira &, 2024.
"Mucosal boosting enhances vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in macaques,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7998), pages 385-391, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:626:y:2024:i:7998:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06951-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06951-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:626:y:2024:i:7998:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06951-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.