IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v626y2024i7997d10.1038_s41586-023-06922-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affinity-optimizing enhancer variants disrupt development

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Lim

    (University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

  • Joe J. Solvason

    (University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

  • Genevieve E. Ryan

    (University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

  • Sophia H. Le

    (University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

  • Granton A. Jindal

    (University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

  • Paige Steffen

    (University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

  • Simran K. Jandu

    (University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

  • Emma K. Farley

    (University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego)

Abstract

Enhancers control the location and timing of gene expression and contain the majority of variants associated with disease1–3. The ZRS is arguably the most well-studied vertebrate enhancer and mediates the expression of Shh in the developing limb4. Thirty-one human single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) within the ZRS are associated with polydactyly4–6. However, how this enhancer encodes tissue-specific activity, and the mechanisms by which SNVs alter the number of digits, are poorly understood. Here we show that the ETS sites within the ZRS are low affinity, and identify a functional ETS site, ETS-A, with extremely low affinity. Two human SNVs and a synthetic variant optimize the binding affinity of ETS-A subtly from 15% to around 25% relative to the strongest ETS binding sequence, and cause polydactyly with the same penetrance and severity. A greater increase in affinity results in phenotypes that are more penetrant and more severe. Affinity-optimizing SNVs in other ETS sites in the ZRS, as well as in ETS, interferon regulatory factor (IRF), HOX and activator protein 1 (AP-1) sites within a wide variety of enhancers, cause gain-of-function gene expression. The prevalence of binding sites with suboptimal affinity in enhancers creates a vulnerability in genomes whereby SNVs that optimize affinity, even slightly, can be pathogenic. Searching for affinity-optimizing SNVs in genomes could provide a mechanistic approach to identify causal variants that underlie enhanceropathies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Lim & Joe J. Solvason & Genevieve E. Ryan & Sophia H. Le & Granton A. Jindal & Paige Steffen & Simran K. Jandu & Emma K. Farley, 2024. "Affinity-optimizing enhancer variants disrupt development," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7997), pages 151-159, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:626:y:2024:i:7997:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06922-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06922-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06922-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-06922-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:626:y:2024:i:7997:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06922-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.