IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v623y2023i7985d10.1038_s41586-023-06634-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The burden and dynamics of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 in England

Author

Listed:
  • Ben S. Cooper

    (University of Oxford
    Mahidol University)

  • Stephanie Evans

    (UK Health Security Agency)

  • Yalda Jafari

    (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)

  • Thi Mui Pham

    (Utrecht University)

  • Yin Mo

    (University of Oxford
    Mahidol University
    National University Hospital
    National University of Singapore)

  • Cherry Lim

    (University of Oxford
    Mahidol University)

  • Mark G. Pritchard

    (University of Oxford
    University of Oxford)

  • Diane Pople

    (UK Health Security Agency)

  • Victoria Hall

    (UK Health Security Agency)

  • James Stimson

    (UK Health Security Agency)

  • David W. Eyre

    (University of Oxford
    Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    University of Oxford
    NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at University of Oxford in partnership with UKHSA)

  • Jonathan M. Read

    (Lancaster University)

  • Christl A. Donnelly

    (University of Oxford
    University of Oxford
    Imperial College London)

  • Peter Horby

    (University of Oxford)

  • Conall Watson

    (University of Oxford)

  • Sebastian Funk

    (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)

  • Julie V. Robotham

    (UK Health Security Agency
    NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at University of Oxford in partnership with UKHSA)

  • Gwenan M. Knight

    (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
    London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)

Abstract

Hospital-based transmission had a dominant role in Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) epidemics1,2, but large-scale studies of its role in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are lacking. Such transmission risks spreading the virus to the most vulnerable individuals and can have wider-scale impacts through hospital–community interactions. Using data from acute hospitals in England, we quantify within-hospital transmission, evaluate likely pathways of spread and factors associated with heightened transmission risk, and explore the wider dynamical consequences. We estimate that between June 2020 and March 2021 between 95,000 and 167,000 inpatients acquired SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals (1% to 2% of all hospital admissions in this period). Analysis of time series data provided evidence that patients who themselves acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospital were the main sources of transmission to other patients. Increased transmission to inpatients was associated with hospitals having fewer single rooms and lower heated volume per bed. Moreover, we show that reducing hospital transmission could substantially enhance the efficiency of punctuated lockdown measures in suppressing community transmission. These findings reveal the previously unrecognized scale of hospital transmission, have direct implications for targeting of hospital control measures and highlight the need to design hospitals better equipped to limit the transmission of future high-consequence pathogens.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben S. Cooper & Stephanie Evans & Yalda Jafari & Thi Mui Pham & Yin Mo & Cherry Lim & Mark G. Pritchard & Diane Pople & Victoria Hall & James Stimson & David W. Eyre & Jonathan M. Read & Christl A. Do, 2023. "The burden and dynamics of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 in England," Nature, Nature, vol. 623(7985), pages 132-138, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:623:y:2023:i:7985:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06634-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06634-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06634-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-06634-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:623:y:2023:i:7985:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06634-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.