Author
Listed:
- Murad R. Mamedov
(Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology
University of California, San Francisco)
- Shane Vedova
(Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology
University of California, San Francisco)
- Jacob W. Freimer
(Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology
University of California, San Francisco
Stanford University)
- Avinash Das Sahu
(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
University of New Mexico)
- Amrita Ramesh
(University of Chicago)
- Maya M. Arce
(Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology
University of California, San Francisco)
- Angelo D. Meringa
(University Medical Center Utrecht)
- Mineto Ota
(Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology
University of California, San Francisco
Stanford University)
- Peixin Amy Chen
(Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology
University of California, San Francisco)
- Kristina Hanspers
(Gladstone Institutes)
- Vinh Q. Nguyen
(Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology
University of California, San Francisco
University of California, San Francisco
University of California, San Francisco)
- Kirsten A. Takeshima
(Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology)
- Anne C. Rios
(Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
Oncode Institute)
- Jonathan K. Pritchard
(Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Jürgen Kuball
(University Medical Center Utrecht
University Medical Center Utrecht)
- Zsolt Sebestyen
(University Medical Center Utrecht)
- Erin J. Adams
(University of Chicago
University of Chicago)
- Alexander Marson
(Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology
University of California, San Francisco
University of California, San Francisco
University of California, San Francisco)
Abstract
γδ T cells are potent anticancer effectors with the potential to target tumours broadly, independent of patient-specific neoantigens or human leukocyte antigen background1–5. γδ T cells can sense conserved cell stress signals prevalent in transformed cells2,3, although the mechanisms behind the targeting of stressed target cells remain poorly characterized. Vγ9Vδ2 T cells—the most abundant subset of human γδ T cells4—recognize a protein complex containing butyrophilin 2A1 (BTN2A1) and BTN3A1 (refs. 6–8), a widely expressed cell surface protein that is activated by phosphoantigens abundantly produced by tumour cells. Here we combined genome-wide CRISPR screens in target cancer cells to identify pathways that regulate γδ T cell killing and BTN3A cell surface expression. The screens showed previously unappreciated multilayered regulation of BTN3A abundance on the cell surface and triggering of γδ T cells through transcription, post-translational modifications and membrane trafficking. In addition, diverse genetic perturbations and inhibitors disrupting metabolic pathways in the cancer cells, particularly ATP-producing processes, were found to alter BTN3A levels. This induction of both BTN3A and BTN2A1 during metabolic crises is dependent on AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Finally, small-molecule activation of AMPK in a cell line model and in patient-derived tumour organoids led to increased expression of the BTN2A1–BTN3A complex and increased Vγ9Vδ2 T cell receptor-mediated killing. This AMPK-dependent mechanism of metabolic stress-induced ligand upregulation deepens our understanding of γδ T cell stress surveillance and suggests new avenues available to enhance γδ T cell anticancer activity.
Suggested Citation
Murad R. Mamedov & Shane Vedova & Jacob W. Freimer & Avinash Das Sahu & Amrita Ramesh & Maya M. Arce & Angelo D. Meringa & Mineto Ota & Peixin Amy Chen & Kristina Hanspers & Vinh Q. Nguyen & Kirsten A, 2023.
"CRISPR screens decode cancer cell pathways that trigger γδ T cell detection,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 621(7977), pages 188-195, September.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:621:y:2023:i:7977:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06482-x
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06482-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:621:y:2023:i:7977:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06482-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.