IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v620y2023i7974d10.1038_s41586-023-06397-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No evidence for magnetic field effects on the behaviour of Drosophila

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Bassetto

    (University of Oxford
    Carl-von‐Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg)

  • Thomas Reichl

    (Carl-von‐Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg)

  • Dmitry Kobylkov

    (Carl-von‐Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
    University of Trento)

  • Daniel R. Kattnig

    (University of Exeter
    University of Exeter)

  • Michael Winklhofer

    (Carl-von‐Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
    University of Oldenburg)

  • P. J. Hore

    (University of Oxford)

  • Henrik Mouritsen

    (Carl-von‐Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
    University of Oldenburg)

Abstract

Migratory songbirds have the remarkable ability to extract directional information from the Earth’s magnetic field1,2. The exact mechanism of this light-dependent magnetic compass sense, however, is not fully understood. The most promising hypothesis focuses on the quantum spin dynamics of transient radical pairs formed in cryptochrome proteins in the retina3–5. Frustratingly, much of the supporting evidence for this theory is circumstantial, largely because of the extreme challenges posed by genetic modification of wild birds. Drosophila has therefore been recruited as a model organism, and several influential reports of cryptochrome-mediated magnetic field effects on fly behaviour have been widely interpreted as support for a radical pair-based mechanism in birds6–23. Here we report the results of an extensive study testing magnetic field effects on 97,658 flies moving in a two-arm maze and on 10,960 flies performing the spontaneous escape behaviour known as negative geotaxis. Under meticulously controlled conditions and with vast sample sizes, we have been unable to find evidence for magnetically sensitive behaviour in Drosophila. Moreover, after reassessment of the statistical approaches and sample sizes used in the studies that we tried to replicate, we suggest that many—if not all—of the original results were false positives. Our findings therefore cast considerable doubt on the existence of magnetic sensing in Drosophila and thus strongly suggest that night-migratory songbirds remain the organism of choice for elucidating the mechanism of light-dependent magnetoreception.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Bassetto & Thomas Reichl & Dmitry Kobylkov & Daniel R. Kattnig & Michael Winklhofer & P. J. Hore & Henrik Mouritsen, 2023. "No evidence for magnetic field effects on the behaviour of Drosophila," Nature, Nature, vol. 620(7974), pages 595-599, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:620:y:2023:i:7974:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06397-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06397-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06397-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-06397-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:620:y:2023:i:7974:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06397-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.