Author
Listed:
- Justin E. Silpe
(Princeton University
Howard Hughes Medical Institute)
- Olivia P. Duddy
(Princeton University)
- Grace E. Johnson
(Princeton University
Howard Hughes Medical Institute)
- Grace A. Beggs
(Princeton University)
- Fatima A. Hussain
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
- Kevin J. Forsberg
(University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)
- Bonnie L. Bassler
(Princeton University
Howard Hughes Medical Institute)
Abstract
Most bacteria in the biosphere are predicted to be polylysogens harbouring multiple prophages1–5. In studied systems, prophage induction from lysogeny to lysis is near-universally driven by DNA-damaging agents6. Thus, how co-residing prophages compete for cell resources if they respond to an identical trigger is unknown. Here we discover regulatory modules that control prophage induction independently of the DNA-damage cue. The modules bear little resemblance at the sequence level but share a regulatory logic by having a transcription factor that activates the expression of a neighbouring gene that encodes a small protein. The small protein inactivates the master repressor of lysis, which leads to induction. Polylysogens that harbour two prophages exposed to DNA damage release mixed populations of phages. Single-cell analyses reveal that this blend is a consequence of discrete subsets of cells producing one, the other or both phages. By contrast, induction through the DNA-damage-independent module results in cells producing only the phage sensitive to that specific cue. Thus, in the polylysogens tested, the stimulus used to induce lysis determines phage productivity. Considering the lack of potent DNA-damaging agents in natural habitats, additional phage-encoded sensory pathways to lysis likely have fundamental roles in phage–host biology and inter-prophage competition.
Suggested Citation
Justin E. Silpe & Olivia P. Duddy & Grace E. Johnson & Grace A. Beggs & Fatima A. Hussain & Kevin J. Forsberg & Bonnie L. Bassler, 2023.
"Small protein modules dictate prophage fates during polylysogeny,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 620(7974), pages 625-633, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:620:y:2023:i:7974:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06376-y
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06376-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:620:y:2023:i:7974:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06376-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.