Author
Listed:
- Adam C. Carnall
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
- Ross J. McLure
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
- James S. Dunlop
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
- Derek J. McLeod
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
- Vivienne Wild
(University of St Andrews)
- Fergus Cullen
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
- Dan Magee
(UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California)
- Ryan Begley
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
- Andrea Cimatti
(University of Bologna
Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio)
- Callum T. Donnan
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
- Massissilia L. Hamadouche
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
- Sophie M. Jewell
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
- Sam Walker
(University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory)
Abstract
The extremely rapid assembly of the earliest galaxies during the first billion years of cosmic history is a major challenge for our understanding of galaxy formation physics1–5. The advent of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has exacerbated this issue by confirming the existence of galaxies in substantial numbers as early as the first few hundred million years6–8. Perhaps even more surprisingly, in some galaxies, this initial highly efficient star formation rapidly shuts down, or quenches, giving rise to massive quiescent galaxies as little as 1.5 billion years after the Big Bang9,10. However, due to their faintness and red colour, it has proven extremely challenging to learn about these extreme quiescent galaxies, or to confirm whether any existed at earlier times. Here we report the spectroscopic confirmation of a massive quiescent galaxy, GS-9209, at redshift, z = 4.658, just 1.25 billion years after the Big Bang, using the JWST Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec). From these data we infer a stellar mass of M* = 3.8 ± 0.2 × 1010 M⊙, which formed over a roughly 200 Myr period before this galaxy quenched its star-formation activity at $$z={6.5}_{-0.5}^{+0.2}$$ z = 6.5 − 0.5 + 0.2 , when the Universe was approximately 800 Myr old. This galaxy is both a likely descendent of the highest-redshift submillimetre galaxies and quasars, and a likely progenitor for the dense, ancient cores of the most massive local galaxies.
Suggested Citation
Adam C. Carnall & Ross J. McLure & James S. Dunlop & Derek J. McLeod & Vivienne Wild & Fergus Cullen & Dan Magee & Ryan Begley & Andrea Cimatti & Callum T. Donnan & Massissilia L. Hamadouche & Sophie , 2023.
"A massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.658,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 619(7971), pages 716-719, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:619:y:2023:i:7971:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06158-6
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:619:y:2023:i:7971:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06158-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.