IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v619y2023i7970d10.1038_s41586-023-06179-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structure and function of the RAD51B–RAD51C–RAD51D–XRCC2 tumour suppressor

Author

Listed:
  • Luke A. Greenhough

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Chih-Chao Liang

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Ondrej Belan

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    Harvard Medical School
    Brigham and Women’s Hospital)

  • Simone Kunzelmann

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Sarah Maslen

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    AstraZeneca)

  • Roopesh Anand

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Mark Skehel

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Simon J. Boulton

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Stephen C. West

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

Abstract

Homologous recombination is a fundamental process of life. It is required for the protection and restart of broken replication forks, the repair of chromosome breaks and the exchange of genetic material during meiosis. Individuals with mutations in key recombination genes, such as BRCA2 (also known as FANCD1), or the RAD51 paralogues RAD51B, RAD51C (also known as FANCO), RAD51D, XRCC2 (also known as FANCU) and XRCC3, are predisposed to breast, ovarian and prostate cancers1–10 and the cancer-prone syndrome Fanconi anaemia11–13. The BRCA2 tumour suppressor protein—the product of BRCA2—is well characterized, but the cellular functions of the RAD51 paralogues remain unclear. Genetic knockouts display growth defects, reduced RAD51 focus formation, spontaneous chromosome abnormalities, sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and replication fork defects14,15, but the precise molecular roles of RAD51 paralogues in fork stability, DNA repair and cancer avoidance remain unknown. Here we used cryo-electron microscopy, AlphaFold2 modelling and structural proteomics to determine the structure of the RAD51B–RAD51C–RAD51D–XRCC2 complex (BCDX2), revealing that RAD51C–RAD51D–XRCC2 mimics three RAD51 protomers aligned within a nucleoprotein filament, whereas RAD51B is highly dynamic. Biochemical and single-molecule analyses showed that BCDX2 stimulates the nucleation and extension of RAD51 filaments—which are essential for recombinational DNA repair—in reactions that depend on the coupled ATPase activities of RAD51B and RAD51C. Our studies demonstrate that BCDX2 orchestrates RAD51 assembly on single stranded DNA for replication fork protection and double strand break repair, in reactions that are critical for tumour avoidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke A. Greenhough & Chih-Chao Liang & Ondrej Belan & Simone Kunzelmann & Sarah Maslen & Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni & Roopesh Anand & Mark Skehel & Simon J. Boulton & Stephen C. West, 2023. "Structure and function of the RAD51B–RAD51C–RAD51D–XRCC2 tumour suppressor," Nature, Nature, vol. 619(7970), pages 650-657, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:619:y:2023:i:7970:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06179-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06179-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06179-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-06179-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah R. Hengel & Katherine G. Oppenheimer & Chelsea M. Smith & Matthew A. Schaich & Hayley L. Rein & Julieta Martino & Kristie E. Darrah & Maggie Witham & Oluchi C. Ezekwenna & Kyle R. Burton & Benne, 2024. "The human Shu complex promotes RAD51 activity by modulating RPA dynamics on ssDNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:619:y:2023:i:7970:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06179-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.