Author
Listed:
- Anand V. R. Kornepati
(Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health)
- Cody M. Rogers
(University of Texas Health)
- Patrick Sung
(Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health
University of Texas Health
University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center)
- Tyler J. Curiel
(Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health
University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center
University of Texas Health
Dartmouth Health, Dartmouth Cancer Center and the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth)
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) immunotherapy is a first-line treatment for selected cancers, yet the mechanisms of its efficacy remain incompletely understood. Furthermore, only a minority of patients with cancer benefit from ICB, and there is a lack of fully informative treatment response biomarkers. Selectively exploiting defects in DNA damage repair is also a standard treatment for cancer, spurred by enhanced understanding of the DNA damage response (DDR). DDR and ICB are closely linked—faulty DDR produces immunogenic cancer neoantigens that can increase the efficacy of ICB therapy, and tumour mutational burden is a good but imperfect biomarker for the response to ICB. DDR studies in ICB efficacy initially focused on contributions to neoantigen burden. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that ICB efficacy is complicated by the immunogenic effects of nucleic acids generated from exogenous DNA damage or endogenous processes such as DNA replication. Chemotherapy, radiation, or selective DDR inhibitors (such as PARP inhibitors) can generate aberrant nucleic acids to induce tumour immunogenicity independently of neoantigens. Independent of their functions in immunity, targets of immunotherapy such as cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS) or PD-L1 can crosstalk with DDR or the DNA repair machinery to influence the response to DNA-damaging agents. Here we review the rapidly evolving, multifaceted interfaces between DDR, nucleic acid immunogenicity and immunotherapy efficacy, focusing on ICB. Understanding these interrelated processes could explain ICB treatment failures and reveal novel exploitable therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancers. We conclude by addressing major unanswered questions and new research directions.
Suggested Citation
Anand V. R. Kornepati & Cody M. Rogers & Patrick Sung & Tyler J. Curiel, 2023.
"The complementarity of DDR, nucleic acids and anti-tumour immunity,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 619(7970), pages 475-486, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:619:y:2023:i:7970:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06069-6
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06069-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:619:y:2023:i:7970:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06069-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.