IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v610y2022i7932d10.1038_s41586-022-05318-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Keith

    (University of New South Wales
    Industry and Environment
    IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management)

  • José R. Ferrer-Paris

    (University of New South Wales
    IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management)

  • Emily Nicholson

    (IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management
    Deakin University)

  • Melanie J. Bishop

    (Macquarie University)

  • Beth A. Polidoro

    (Arizona State University)

  • Eva Ramirez-Llodra

    (Norwegian Institute for Water Research
    REV Ocean)

  • Mark G. Tozer

    (University of New South Wales
    Industry and Environment)

  • Jeanne L. Nel

    (Nelson Mandela University
    Wageningen University)

  • Ralph Nally

    (The University of Melbourne)

  • Edward J. Gregr

    (University of British Columbia
    SciTech Environmental Consulting)

  • Kate E. Watermeyer

    (Deakin University)

  • Franz Essl

    (University of Vienna
    Stellenbosch University)

  • Don Faber-Langendoen

    (NatureServe)

  • Janet Franklin

    (University of California)

  • Caroline E. R. Lehmann

    (Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
    University of Edinburgh)

  • Andrés Etter

    (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana)

  • Dirk J. Roux

    (Nelson Mandela University
    South African National Parks)

  • Jonathan S. Stark

    (Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water)

  • Jessica A. Rowland

    (IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management
    Deakin University)

  • Neil A. Brummitt

    (Natural History Museum)

  • Ulla C. Fernandez-Arcaya

    (Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares)

  • Iain M. Suthers

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Susan K. Wiser

    (Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research)

  • Ian Donohue

    (Trinity College Dublin)

  • Leland J. Jackson

    (University of Calgary)

  • R. Toby Pennington

    (Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
    University of Exeter)

  • Thomas M. Iliffe

    (Texas A&M University)

  • Vasilis Gerovasileiou

    (Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture (IMBBC)
    Ionian University)

  • Paul Giller

    (University College Cork
    South China Normal University)

  • Belinda J. Robson

    (Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University)

  • Nathalie Pettorelli

    (Zoological Society of London)

  • Angela Andrade

    (IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management
    Conservation International Colombia)

  • Arild Lindgaard

    (Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre)

  • Teemu Tahvanainen

    (University of Eastern Finland)

  • Aleks Terauds

    (Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water)

  • Michael A. Chadwick

    (King’s College London)

  • Nicholas J. Murray

    (University of New South Wales
    IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management
    James Cook University)

  • Justin Moat

    (Royal Botanic Gardens Kew)

  • Patricio Pliscoff

    (Universidad Católica de Chile
    Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad)

  • Irene Zager

    (Provita)

  • Richard T. Kingsford

    (University of New South Wales)

Abstract

As the United Nations develops a post-2020 global biodiversity framework for the Convention on Biological Diversity, attention is focusing on how new goals and targets for ecosystem conservation might serve its vision of ‘living in harmony with nature’1,2. Advancing dual imperatives to conserve biodiversity and sustain ecosystem services requires reliable and resilient generalizations and predictions about ecosystem responses to environmental change and management3. Ecosystems vary in their biota4, service provision5 and relative exposure to risks6, yet there is no globally consistent classification of ecosystems that reflects functional responses to change and management. This hampers progress on developing conservation targets and sustainability goals. Here we present the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Global Ecosystem Typology, a conceptually robust, scalable, spatially explicit approach for generalizations and predictions about functions, biota, risks and management remedies across the entire biosphere. The outcome of a major cross-disciplinary collaboration, this novel framework places all of Earth’s ecosystems into a unifying theoretical context to guide the transformation of ecosystem policy and management from global to local scales. This new information infrastructure will support knowledge transfer for ecosystem-specific management and restoration, globally standardized ecosystem risk assessments, natural capital accounting and progress on the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Keith & José R. Ferrer-Paris & Emily Nicholson & Melanie J. Bishop & Beth A. Polidoro & Eva Ramirez-Llodra & Mark G. Tozer & Jeanne L. Nel & Ralph Nally & Edward J. Gregr & Kate E. Watermeyer, 2022. "A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7932), pages 513-518, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:610:y:2022:i:7932:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05318-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05318-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05318-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-022-05318-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:610:y:2022:i:7932:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05318-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.