Author
Listed:
- Yunhuan Liu
(Chang’an University)
- Emily Carlisle
(University of Bristol)
- Huaqiao Zhang
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Ben Yang
(Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences)
- Michael Steiner
(Shandong University of Science and Technology
Freie Universität Berlin)
- Tiequan Shao
(Chang’an University)
- Baichuan Duan
(First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resource)
- Federica Marone
(Paul Scherrer Institut)
- Shuhai Xiao
(Virginia Tech)
- Philip C. J. Donoghue
(University of Bristol)
Abstract
The early history of deuterostomes, the group composed of the chordates, echinoderms and hemichordates1, is still controversial, not least because of a paucity of stem representatives of these clades2–5. The early Cambrian microscopic animal Saccorhytus coronarius was interpreted as an early deuterostome on the basis of purported pharyngeal openings, providing evidence for a meiofaunal ancestry6 and an explanation for the temporal mismatch between palaeontological and molecular clock timescales of animal evolution6–8. Here we report new material of S. coronarius, which is reconstructed as a millimetric and ellipsoidal meiobenthic animal with spinose armour and a terminal mouth but no anus. Purported pharyngeal openings in support of the deuterostome hypothesis6 are shown to be taphonomic artefacts. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that S. coronarius belongs to total-group Ecdysozoa, expanding the morphological disparity and ecological diversity of early Cambrian ecdysozoans.
Suggested Citation
Yunhuan Liu & Emily Carlisle & Huaqiao Zhang & Ben Yang & Michael Steiner & Tiequan Shao & Baichuan Duan & Federica Marone & Shuhai Xiao & Philip C. J. Donoghue, 2022.
"Saccorhytus is an early ecdysozoan and not the earliest deuterostome,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 609(7927), pages 541-546, September.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:609:y:2022:i:7927:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05107-z
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05107-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:609:y:2022:i:7927:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05107-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.