IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v608y2022i7923d10.1038_s41586-022-04980-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection

Author

Listed:
  • Yunlong Cao

    (Peking University
    Changping Laboratory)

  • Ayijiang Yisimayi

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Fanchong Jian

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Weiliang Song

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Tianhe Xiao

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Lei Wang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Shuo Du

    (Peking University)

  • Jing Wang

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Qianqian Li

    (National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC))

  • Xiaosu Chen

    (Nankai University)

  • Yuanling Yu

    (Changping Laboratory
    National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC))

  • Peng Wang

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Zhiying Zhang

    (Peking University)

  • Pulan Liu

    (Peking University)

  • Ran An

    (Peking University)

  • Xiaohua Hao

    (Capital Medical University)

  • Yao Wang

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Jing Wang

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Rui Feng

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Haiyan Sun

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Lijuan Zhao

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Wen Zhang

    (Capital Medical University)

  • Dong Zhao

    (Capital Medical University)

  • Jiang Zheng

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Lingling Yu

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Can Li

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Na Zhang

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Rui Wang

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Xiao Niu

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Sijie Yang

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Xuetao Song

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Yangyang Chai

    (Nankai University)

  • Ye Hu

    (Nankai University)

  • Yansong Shi

    (Nankai University)

  • Linlin Zheng

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Zhiqiang Li

    (Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Qingqing Gu

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Fei Shao

    (Changping Laboratory)

  • Weijin Huang

    (National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC))

  • Ronghua Jin

    (Capital Medical University)

  • Zhongyang Shen

    (Nankai University)

  • Youchun Wang

    (Changping Laboratory
    National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC))

  • Xiangxi Wang

    (Changping Laboratory
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Junyu Xiao

    (Changping Laboratory
    Peking University
    Peking University
    Peking University)

  • Xiaoliang Sunney Xie

    (Peking University
    Changping Laboratory)

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron sublineages BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 exhibit higher transmissibility than the BA.2 lineage1. The receptor binding and immune-evasion capability of these recently emerged variants require immediate investigation. Here, coupled with structural comparisons of the spike proteins, we show that BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 (BA.4 and BA.5 are hereafter referred collectively to as BA.4/BA.5) exhibit similar binding affinities to BA.2 for the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Of note, BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5 display increased evasion of neutralizing antibodies compared with BA.2 against plasma from triple-vaccinated individuals or from individuals who developed a BA.1 infection after vaccination. To delineate the underlying antibody-evasion mechanism, we determined the escape mutation profiles2, epitope distribution3 and Omicron-neutralization efficiency of 1,640 neutralizing antibodies directed against the receptor-binding domain of the viral spike protein, including 614 antibodies isolated from people who had recovered from BA.1 infection. BA.1 infection after vaccination predominantly recalls humoral immune memory directed against ancestral (hereafter referred to as wild-type (WT)) SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The resulting elicited antibodies could neutralize both WT SARS-CoV-2 and BA.1 and are enriched on epitopes on spike that do not bind ACE2. However, most of these cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies are evaded by spike mutants L452Q, L452R and F486V. BA.1 infection can also induce new clones of BA.1-specific antibodies that potently neutralize BA.1. Nevertheless, these neutralizing antibodies are largely evaded by BA.2 and BA.4/BA.5 owing to D405N and F486V mutations, and react weakly to pre-Omicron variants, exhibiting narrow neutralization breadths. The therapeutic neutralizing antibodies bebtelovimab4 and cilgavimab5 can effectively neutralize BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5, whereas the S371F, D405N and R408S mutations undermine most broadly sarbecovirus-neutralizing antibodies. Together, our results indicate that Omicron may evolve mutations to evade the humoral immunity elicited by BA.1 infection, suggesting that BA.1-derived vaccine boosters may not achieve broad-spectrum protection against new Omicron variants.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunlong Cao & Ayijiang Yisimayi & Fanchong Jian & Weiliang Song & Tianhe Xiao & Lei Wang & Shuo Du & Jing Wang & Qianqian Li & Xiaosu Chen & Yuanling Yu & Peng Wang & Zhiying Zhang & Pulan Liu & Ran A, 2022. "BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection," Nature, Nature, vol. 608(7923), pages 593-602, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:608:y:2022:i:7923:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04980-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04980-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04980-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-022-04980-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:608:y:2022:i:7923:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04980-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.