Author
Listed:
- Sjoerd J. Klaasen
(Hubrecht Institute-KNAW (Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences) and University Medical Centre Utrecht)
- My Anh Truong
(University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University)
- Richard H. Jaarsveld
(Hubrecht Institute-KNAW (Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences) and University Medical Centre Utrecht)
- Isabella Koprivec
(Ruđer Bošković Institute)
- Valentina Štimac
(Ruđer Bošković Institute)
- Sippe G. Vries
(University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University)
- Patrik Risteski
(Ruđer Bošković Institute)
- Snježana Kodba
(Ruđer Bošković Institute)
- Kruno Vukušić
(Ruđer Bošković Institute)
- Kim L. Luca
(Hubrecht Institute-KNAW (Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences) and University Medical Centre Utrecht)
- Joana F. Marques
(Hubrecht Institute-KNAW (Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences) and University Medical Centre Utrecht)
- Elianne M. Gerrits
(Hubrecht Institute-KNAW (Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences) and University Medical Centre Utrecht)
- Bjorn Bakker
(University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen)
- Floris Foijer
(University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen)
- Jop Kind
(Hubrecht Institute-KNAW (Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences) and University Medical Centre Utrecht
Radboud University Nijmegen)
- Iva M. Tolić
(Ruđer Bošković Institute)
- Susanne M. A. Lens
(University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University)
- Geert J. P. L. Kops
(Hubrecht Institute-KNAW (Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences) and University Medical Centre Utrecht)
Abstract
Chromosome segregation errors during cell divisions generate aneuploidies and micronuclei, which can undergo extensive chromosomal rearrangements such as chromothripsis1–5. Selective pressures then shape distinct aneuploidy and rearrangement patterns—for example, in cancer6,7—but it is unknown whether initial biases in segregation errors and micronucleation exist for particular chromosomes. Using single-cell DNA sequencing8 after an error-prone mitosis in untransformed, diploid cell lines and organoids, we show that chromosomes have different segregation error frequencies that result in non-random aneuploidy landscapes. Isolation and sequencing of single micronuclei from these cells showed that mis-segregating chromosomes frequently also preferentially become entrapped in micronuclei. A similar bias was found in naturally occurring micronuclei of two cancer cell lines. We find that segregation error frequencies of individual chromosomes correlate with their location in the interphase nucleus, and show that this is highest for peripheral chromosomes behind spindle poles. Randomization of chromosome positions, Cas9-mediated live tracking and forced repositioning of individual chromosomes showed that a greater distance from the nuclear centre directly increases the propensity to mis-segregate. Accordingly, chromothripsis in cancer genomes9 and aneuploidies in early development10 occur more frequently for larger chromosomes, which are preferentially located near the nuclear periphery. Our findings reveal a direct link between nuclear chromosome positions, segregation error frequencies and micronucleus content, with implications for our understanding of tumour genome evolution and the origins of specific aneuploidies during development.
Suggested Citation
Sjoerd J. Klaasen & My Anh Truong & Richard H. Jaarsveld & Isabella Koprivec & Valentina Štimac & Sippe G. Vries & Patrik Risteski & Snježana Kodba & Kruno Vukušić & Kim L. Luca & Joana F. Marques & E, 2022.
"Nuclear chromosome locations dictate segregation error frequencies,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 607(7919), pages 604-609, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:607:y:2022:i:7919:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04938-0
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04938-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:607:y:2022:i:7919:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04938-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.