Author
Listed:
- Sadegh Ebrahimi
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Jérôme Lecoq
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University
Allen Institute, Mindscope Program)
- Oleg Rumyantsev
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Tugce Tasci
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Yanping Zhang
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Cristina Irimia
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Jane Li
(Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Surya Ganguli
(Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Mark J. Schnitzer
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
Abstract
Reliable sensory discrimination must arise from high-fidelity neural representations and communication between brain areas. However, how neocortical sensory processing overcomes the substantial variability of neuronal sensory responses remains undetermined1–6. Here we imaged neuronal activity in eight neocortical areas concurrently and over five days in mice performing a visual discrimination task, yielding longitudinal recordings of more than 21,000 neurons. Analyses revealed a sequence of events across the neocortex starting from a resting state, to early stages of perception, and through the formation of a task response. At rest, the neocortex had one pattern of functional connections, identified through sets of areas that shared activity cofluctuations7,8. Within about 200 ms after the onset of the sensory stimulus, such connections rearranged, with different areas sharing cofluctuations and task-related information. During this short-lived state (approximately 300 ms duration), both inter-area sensory data transmission and the redundancy of sensory encoding peaked, reflecting a transient increase in correlated fluctuations among task-related neurons. By around 0.5 s after stimulus onset, the visual representation reached a more stable form, the structure of which was robust to the prominent, day-to-day variations in the responses of individual cells. About 1 s into stimulus presentation, a global fluctuation mode conveyed the upcoming response of the mouse to every area examined and was orthogonal to modes carrying sensory data. Overall, the neocortex supports sensory performance through brief elevations in sensory coding redundancy near the start of perception, neural population codes that are robust to cellular variability, and widespread inter-area fluctuation modes that transmit sensory data and task responses in non-interfering channels.
Suggested Citation
Sadegh Ebrahimi & Jérôme Lecoq & Oleg Rumyantsev & Tugce Tasci & Yanping Zhang & Cristina Irimia & Jane Li & Surya Ganguli & Mark J. Schnitzer, 2022.
"Emergent reliability in sensory cortical coding and inter-area communication,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 605(7911), pages 713-721, May.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:605:y:2022:i:7911:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04724-y
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04724-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Zvi N. Roth & Elisha P. Merriam, 2023.
"Representations in human primary visual cortex drift over time,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
- Edward A. B. Horrocks & Fabio R. Rodrigues & Aman B. Saleem, 2024.
"Flexible neural population dynamics govern the speed and stability of sensory encoding in mouse visual cortex,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:605:y:2022:i:7911:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04724-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.