IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v605y2022i7911d10.1038_s41586-022-04675-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mosquito brains encode unique features of human odour to drive host seeking

Author

Listed:
  • Zhilei Zhao

    (Princeton University
    Princeton University
    Princeton University
    Cornell University)

  • Jessica L. Zung

    (Princeton University
    Princeton University
    Princeton University)

  • Annika Hinze

    (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Alexis L. Kriete

    (Princeton University
    Princeton University
    North Carolina State University)

  • Azwad Iqbal

    (Princeton University
    Princeton University
    Cornell University)

  • Meg A. Younger

    (The Rockefeller University
    Boston University)

  • Benjamin J. Matthews

    (The Rockefeller University
    University of British Columbia)

  • Dorit Merhof

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Stephan Thiberge

    (Princeton University
    Princeton University)

  • Rickard Ignell

    (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Martin Strauch

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Carolyn S. McBride

    (Princeton University
    Princeton University
    Princeton University)

Abstract

A globally invasive form of the mosquito Aedes aegypti specializes in biting humans, making it an efficient disease vector1. Host-seeking female mosquitoes strongly prefer human odour over the odour of animals2,3, but exactly how they distinguish between the two is not known. Vertebrate odours are complex blends of volatile chemicals with many shared components4–7, making discrimination an interesting sensory coding challenge. Here we show that human and animal odours evoke activity in distinct combinations of olfactory glomeruli within the Ae. aegypti antennal lobe. One glomerulus in particular is strongly activated by human odour but responds weakly, or not at all, to animal odour. This human-sensitive glomerulus is selectively tuned to the long-chain aldehydes decanal and undecanal, which we show are consistently enriched in human odour and which probably originate from unique human skin lipids. Using synthetic blends, we further demonstrate that signalling in the human-sensitive glomerulus significantly enhances long-range host-seeking behaviour in a wind tunnel, recapitulating preference for human over animal odours. Our research suggests that animal brains may distil complex odour stimuli of innate biological relevance into simple neural codes and reveals targets for the design of next-generation mosquito-control strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhilei Zhao & Jessica L. Zung & Annika Hinze & Alexis L. Kriete & Azwad Iqbal & Meg A. Younger & Benjamin J. Matthews & Dorit Merhof & Stephan Thiberge & Rickard Ignell & Martin Strauch & Carolyn S. M, 2022. "Mosquito brains encode unique features of human odour to drive host seeking," Nature, Nature, vol. 605(7911), pages 706-712, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:605:y:2022:i:7911:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04675-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04675-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04675-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-022-04675-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pranjul Singh & Shefali Goyal & Smith Gupta & Sanket Garg & Abhinav Tiwari & Varad Rajput & Alexander Shakeel Bates & Arjit Kant Gupta & Nitin Gupta, 2023. "Combinatorial encoding of odors in the mosquito antennal lobe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:605:y:2022:i:7911:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04675-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.