IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v602y2022i7897d10.1038_s41586-022-04402-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanisms of inhibition and activation of extrasynaptic αβ GABAA receptors

Author

Listed:
  • Vikram Babu Kasaragod

    (University of Cambridge
    MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology)

  • Martin Mortensen

    (University College London)

  • Steven W. Hardwick

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Ayla A. Wahid

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Valentina Dorovykh

    (University College London)

  • Dimitri Y. Chirgadze

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Trevor G. Smart

    (University College London)

  • Paul S. Miller

    (University of Cambridge)

Abstract

Type A GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) receptors represent a diverse population in the mammalian brain, forming pentamers from combinations of α-, β-, γ-, δ-, ε-, ρ-, θ- and π-subunits1. αβ, α4βδ, α6βδ and α5βγ receptors favour extrasynaptic localization, and mediate an essential persistent (tonic) inhibitory conductance in many regions of the mammalian brain1,2. Mutations of these receptors in humans are linked to epilepsy and insomnia3,4. Altered extrasynaptic receptor function is implicated in insomnia, stroke and Angelman and Fragile X syndromes1,5, and drugs targeting these receptors are used to treat postpartum depression6. Tonic GABAergic responses are moderated to avoid excessive suppression of neuronal communication, and can exhibit high sensitivity to Zn2+ blockade, in contrast to synapse-preferring α1βγ, α2βγ and α3βγ receptor responses5,7–12. Here, to resolve these distinctive features, we determined structures of the predominantly extrasynaptic αβ GABAA receptor class. An inhibited state bound by both the lethal paralysing agent α-cobratoxin13 and Zn2+ was used in comparisons with GABA–Zn2+ and GABA-bound structures. Zn2+ nullifies the GABA response by non-competitively plugging the extracellular end of the pore to block chloride conductance. In the absence of Zn2+, the GABA signalling response initially follows the canonical route until it reaches the pore. In contrast to synaptic GABAA receptors, expansion of the midway pore activation gate is limited and it remains closed, reflecting the intrinsic low efficacy that characterizes the extrasynaptic receptor. Overall, this study explains distinct traits adopted by αβ receptors that adapt them to a role in tonic signalling.

Suggested Citation

  • Vikram Babu Kasaragod & Martin Mortensen & Steven W. Hardwick & Ayla A. Wahid & Valentina Dorovykh & Dimitri Y. Chirgadze & Trevor G. Smart & Paul S. Miller, 2022. "Mechanisms of inhibition and activation of extrasynaptic αβ GABAA receptors," Nature, Nature, vol. 602(7897), pages 529-533, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:602:y:2022:i:7897:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04402-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04402-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04402-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-022-04402-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vikram Dalal & Mark J. Arcario & John T. Petroff & Brandon K. Tan & Noah M. Dietzen & Michael J. Rau & James A. J. Fitzpatrick & Grace Brannigan & Wayland W. L. Cheng, 2024. "Lipid nanodisc scaffold and size alter the structure of a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Nikhil Bharambe & Zhuowen Li & David Seiferth & Asha Manikkoth Balakrishna & Philip C. Biggin & Sandip Basak, 2024. "Cryo-EM structures of prokaryotic ligand-gated ion channel GLIC provide insights into gating in a lipid environment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:602:y:2022:i:7897:d:10.1038_s41586-022-04402-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.