Author
Listed:
- Tim Cunningham
(The University of Warwick
University of Warwick)
- Peter J. Wheatley
(The University of Warwick
University of Warwick)
- Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay
(The University of Warwick
University of Warwick)
- Boris T. Gänsicke
(The University of Warwick
University of Warwick)
- George W. King
(University of Michigan)
- Odette Toloza
(Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María
Millennium Nucleus for Planet Formation (NPF))
- Dimitri Veras
(The University of Warwick
University of Warwick)
Abstract
The atmospheres of a large proportion of white dwarf stars are polluted by heavy elements1 that are expected to sink out of visible layers on short timescales2,3. This has been interpreted as a signature of ongoing accretion of debris from asteroids4, comets5 and giant planets6. This scenario is supported by the detection of debris discs7 and transits of planetary fragments8 around some white dwarfs. However, photospheric metals are only indirect evidence for ongoing accretion, and the inferred accretion rates and parent body compositions heavily depend on models of diffusion and mixing processes within the white dwarf atmosphere9–11. Here we report a 4.4σ detection of X-rays from a polluted white dwarf, G29–38. From the measured X-ray luminosity, we derive an instantaneous accretion rate of $${\dot{M}}_{{\rm{X}}}={1.63}_{-0.40}^{+1.29}\times {10}^{9}\,{\rm{g}}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-1}$$ M ̇ X = 1.63 − 0.40 + 1.29 × 10 9 g s − 1 , which is independent of stellar atmosphere models. This rate is higher than estimates from past studies of the photospheric abundances of G29–38, suggesting that convective overshoot may be needed to model the spectra of debris-accreting white dwarfs. We measure a low plasma temperature of kBT = 0.5 ± 0.2 keV, corroborating the predicted bombardment solution for white dwarfs accreting at low accretion rates12,13.
Suggested Citation
Tim Cunningham & Peter J. Wheatley & Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay & Boris T. Gänsicke & George W. King & Odette Toloza & Dimitri Veras, 2022.
"A white dwarf accreting planetary material determined from X-ray observations,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 602(7896), pages 219-222, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:602:y:2022:i:7896:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04300-w
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04300-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:602:y:2022:i:7896:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04300-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.