IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v601y2022i7894d10.1038_s41586-021-04241-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A high-resolution picture of kinship practices in an Early Neolithic tomb

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Fowler

    (Newcastle University)

  • Iñigo Olalde

    (University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU
    Harvard Medical School
    Ikerbasque—Basque Foundation of Science)

  • Vicki Cummings

    (University of Central Lancashire)

  • Ian Armit

    (University of York)

  • Lindsey Büster

    (University of York)

  • Sarah Cuthbert

    (University of Exeter)

  • Nadin Rohland

    (Harvard Medical School
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Olivia Cheronet

    (University of Vienna)

  • Ron Pinhasi

    (University of Vienna)

  • David Reich

    (Harvard Medical School
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
    Harvard University
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

Abstract

To explore kinship practices at chambered tombs in Early Neolithic Britain, here we combined archaeological and genetic analyses of 35 individuals who lived about 5,700 years ago and were entombed at Hazleton North long cairn1. Twenty-seven individuals are part of the first extended pedigree reconstructed from ancient DNA, a five-generation family whose many interrelationships provide statistical power to document kinship practices that were invisible without direct genetic data. Patrilineal descent was key in determining who was buried in the tomb, as all 15 intergenerational transmissions were through men. The presence of women who had reproduced with lineage men and the absence of adult lineage daughters suggest virilocal burial and female exogamy. We demonstrate that one male progenitor reproduced with four women: the descendants of two of those women were buried in the same half of the tomb over all generations. This suggests that maternal sub-lineages were grouped into branches whose distinctiveness was recognized during the construction of the tomb. Four men descended from non-lineage fathers and mothers who also reproduced with lineage male individuals, suggesting that some men adopted the children of their reproductive partners by other men into their patriline. Eight individuals were not close biological relatives of the main lineage, raising the possibility that kinship also encompassed social bonds independent of biological relatedness.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Fowler & Iñigo Olalde & Vicki Cummings & Ian Armit & Lindsey Büster & Sarah Cuthbert & Nadin Rohland & Olivia Cheronet & Ron Pinhasi & David Reich, 2022. "A high-resolution picture of kinship practices in an Early Neolithic tomb," Nature, Nature, vol. 601(7894), pages 584-587, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:601:y:2022:i:7894:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04241-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04241-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04241-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-021-04241-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maciej Chyleński & Przemysław Makarowicz & Anna Juras & Maja Krzewińska & Łukasz Pospieszny & Edvard Ehler & Agnieszka Breszka & Jacek Górski & Halina Taras & Anita Szczepanek & Marta Polańska & Piotr, 2023. "Patrilocality and hunter-gatherer-related ancestry of populations in East-Central Europe during the Middle Bronze Age," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:601:y:2022:i:7894:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04241-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.