Author
Listed:
- M. J. Borchert
(RIKEN
Leibniz Universität Hannover
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt)
- J. A. Devlin
(RIKEN
CERN)
- S. R. Erlewein
(RIKEN
CERN
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik)
- M. Fleck
(RIKEN
University of Tokyo)
- J. A. Harrington
(RIKEN
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik)
- T. Higuchi
(RIKEN
University of Tokyo)
- B. M. Latacz
(RIKEN)
- F. Voelksen
(RIKEN
GSI-Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung)
- E. J. Wursten
(RIKEN
CERN
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik)
- F. Abbass
(Johannes Gutenberg-Universität)
- M. A. Bohman
(RIKEN
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik)
- A. H. Mooser
(Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik)
- D. Popper
(Johannes Gutenberg-Universität)
- M. Wiesinger
(RIKEN
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik)
- C. Will
(Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik)
- K. Blaum
(Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik)
- Y. Matsuda
(University of Tokyo)
- C. Ospelkaus
(Leibniz Universität Hannover
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt)
- W. Quint
(GSI-Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung)
- J. Walz
(Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität)
- Y. Yamazaki
(RIKEN)
- C. Smorra
(RIKEN
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität)
- S. Ulmer
(RIKEN)
Abstract
The standard model of particle physics is both incredibly successful and glaringly incomplete. Among the questions left open is the striking imbalance of matter and antimatter in the observable universe1, which inspires experiments to compare the fundamental properties of matter/antimatter conjugates with high precision2–5. Our experiments deal with direct investigations of the fundamental properties of protons and antiprotons, performing spectroscopy in advanced cryogenic Penning trap systems6. For instance, we previously compared the proton/antiproton magnetic moments with 1.5 parts per billion fractional precision7,8, which improved upon previous best measurements9 by a factor of greater than 3,000. Here we report on a new comparison of the proton/antiproton charge-to-mass ratios with a fractional uncertainty of 16 parts per trillion. Our result is based on the combination of four independent long-term studies, recorded in a total time span of 1.5 years. We use different measurement methods and experimental set-ups incorporating different systematic effects. The final result, $$-{(q/m)}_{p}/{(q/m)}_{\bar{p}}=1.000000000003(16)$$ − ( q / m ) p / ( q / m ) p ¯ = 1.000000000003 ( 16 ) , is consistent with the fundamental charge–parity–time reversal invariance, and improves the precision of our previous best measurement6 by a factor of 4.3. The measurement tests the standard model at an energy scale of 1.96 × 10−27 gigaelectronvolts (confidence level 0.68), and improves ten coefficients of the standard model extension10. Our cyclotron clock study also constrains hypothetical interactions mediating violations of the clock weak equivalence principle (WEPcc) for antimatter to less than 1.8 × 10−7, and enables the first differential test of the WEPcc using antiprotons11. From this interpretation we constrain the differential WEPcc-violating coefficient to less than 0.030.
Suggested Citation
M. J. Borchert & J. A. Devlin & S. R. Erlewein & M. Fleck & J. A. Harrington & T. Higuchi & B. M. Latacz & F. Voelksen & E. J. Wursten & F. Abbass & M. A. Bohman & A. H. Mooser & D. Popper & M. Wiesin, 2022.
"A 16-parts-per-trillion measurement of the antiproton-to-proton charge–mass ratio,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 601(7891), pages 53-57, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:601:y:2022:i:7891:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04203-w
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04203-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:601:y:2022:i:7891:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04203-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.