IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v601y2022i7891d10.1038_s41586-021-04157-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Depressed 660-km discontinuity caused by akimotoite–bridgmanite transition

Author

Listed:
  • Artem Chanyshev

    (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY
    University of Bayreuth)

  • Takayuki Ishii

    (University of Bayreuth
    Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research)

  • Dmitry Bondar

    (University of Bayreuth)

  • Shrikant Bhat

    (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY)

  • Eun Jeong Kim

    (University of Bayreuth)

  • Robert Farla

    (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY)

  • Keisuke Nishida

    (University of Bayreuth)

  • Zhaodong Liu

    (University of Bayreuth
    Jilin University)

  • Lin Wang

    (University of Bayreuth
    Carnegie Institution)

  • Ayano Nakajima

    (Tohoku University)

  • Bingmin Yan

    (Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research)

  • Hu Tang

    (Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research)

  • Zhen Chen

    (Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research)

  • Yuji Higo

    (Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI))

  • Yoshinori Tange

    (Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI))

  • Tomoo Katsura

    (University of Bayreuth
    Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research)

Abstract

The 660-kilometre seismic discontinuity is the boundary between the Earth’s lower mantle and transition zone and is commonly interpreted as being due to the dissociation of ringwoodite to bridgmanite plus ferropericlase (post-spinel transition)1–3. A distinct feature of the 660-kilometre discontinuity is its depression to 750 kilometres beneath subduction zones4–10. However, in situ X-ray diffraction studies using multi-anvil techniques have demonstrated negative but gentle Clapeyron slopes (that is, the ratio between pressure and temperature changes) of the post-spinel transition that do not allow a significant depression11–13. On the other hand, conventional high-pressure experiments face difficulties in accurate phase identification due to inevitable pressure changes during heating and the persistent presence of metastable phases1,3. Here we determine the post-spinel and akimotoite–bridgmanite transition boundaries by multi-anvil experiments using in situ X-ray diffraction, with the boundaries strictly based on the definition of phase equilibrium. The post-spinel boundary has almost no temperature dependence, whereas the akimotoite–bridgmanite transition has a very steep negative boundary slope at temperatures lower than ambient mantle geotherms. The large depressions of the 660-kilometre discontinuity in cold subduction zones are thus interpreted as the akimotoite–bridgmanite transition. The steep negative boundary of the akimotoite–bridgmanite transition will cause slab stagnation (a stalling of the slab’s descent) due to significant upward buoyancy14,15.

Suggested Citation

  • Artem Chanyshev & Takayuki Ishii & Dmitry Bondar & Shrikant Bhat & Eun Jeong Kim & Robert Farla & Keisuke Nishida & Zhaodong Liu & Lin Wang & Ayano Nakajima & Bingmin Yan & Hu Tang & Zhen Chen & Yuji , 2022. "Depressed 660-km discontinuity caused by akimotoite–bridgmanite transition," Nature, Nature, vol. 601(7891), pages 69-73, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:601:y:2022:i:7891:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04157-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04157-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04157-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-021-04157-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:601:y:2022:i:7891:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04157-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.