IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v599y2021i7884d10.1038_s41586-021-03962-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neural control of affiliative touch in prosocial interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Emily Wu

    (University of California
    University of California)

  • James Dang

    (University of California
    University of California)

  • Lyle Kingsbury

    (University of California
    University of California)

  • Mingmin Zhang

    (University of California
    University of California)

  • Fangmiao Sun

    (University of California
    University of California)

  • Rongfeng K. Hu

    (University of California
    University of California)

  • Weizhe Hong

    (University of California
    University of California)

Abstract

The ability to help and care for others fosters social cohesiveness and is vital to the physical and emotional well-being of social species, including humans1–3. Affiliative social touch, such as allogrooming (grooming behaviour directed towards another individual), is a major type of prosocial behaviour that provides comfort to others1–6. Affiliative touch serves to establish and strengthen social bonds between animals and can help to console distressed conspecifics. However, the neural circuits that promote prosocial affiliative touch have remained unclear. Here we show that mice exhibit affiliative allogrooming behaviour towards distressed partners, providing a consoling effect. The increase in allogrooming occurs in response to different types of stressors and can be elicited by olfactory cues from distressed individuals. Using microendoscopic calcium imaging, we find that neural activity in the medial amygdala (MeA) responds differentially to naive and distressed conspecifics and encodes allogrooming behaviour. Through intersectional functional manipulations, we establish a direct causal role of the MeA in controlling affiliative allogrooming and identify a select, tachykinin-expressing subpopulation of MeA GABAergic (γ-aminobutyric-acid-expressing) neurons that promote this behaviour through their projections to the medial preoptic area. Together, our study demonstrates that mice display prosocial comforting behaviour and reveals a neural circuit mechanism that underlies the encoding and control of affiliative touch during prosocial interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Emily Wu & James Dang & Lyle Kingsbury & Mingmin Zhang & Fangmiao Sun & Rongfeng K. Hu & Weizhe Hong, 2021. "Neural control of affiliative touch in prosocial interaction," Nature, Nature, vol. 599(7884), pages 262-267, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:599:y:2021:i:7884:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03962-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03962-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03962-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-021-03962-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yishan Qu & Lizi Zhang & Wenjuan Hou & Limin Liu & Jing Liu & Lu Li & Xing Guo & Yin Li & Caihong Huang & Zhixiong He & Fadao Tai, 2024. "Distinct medial amygdala oxytocin receptor neurons projections respectively control consolation or aggression in male mandarin voles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Kansai Fukumitsu & Misato Kaneko & Teppo Maruyama & Chihiro Yoshihara & Arthur J. Huang & Thomas J. McHugh & Shigeyoshi Itohara & Minoru Tanaka & Kumi O. Kuroda, 2022. "Amylin-Calcitonin receptor signaling in the medial preoptic area mediates affiliative social behaviors in female mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:599:y:2021:i:7884:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03962-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.