Author
Listed:
- Hamsa Bastani
(University of Pennsylvania)
- Kimon Drakopoulos
(University of Southern California)
- Vishal Gupta
(University of Southern California)
- Ioannis Vlachogiannis
(AgentRisk)
- Christos Hadjichristodoulou
(University of Thessaly)
- Pagona Lagiou
(National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)
- Gkikas Magiorkinis
(National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)
- Dimitrios Paraskevis
(National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)
- Sotirios Tsiodras
(Attikon University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)
Abstract
Throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, countries have relied on a variety of ad hoc border control protocols to allow for non-essential travel while safeguarding public health, from quarantining all travellers to restricting entry from select nations on the basis of population-level epidemiological metrics such as cases, deaths or testing positivity rates1,2. Here we report the design and performance of a reinforcement learning system, nicknamed Eva. In the summer of 2020, Eva was deployed across all Greek borders to limit the influx of asymptomatic travellers infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and to inform border policies through real-time estimates of COVID-19 prevalence. In contrast to country-wide protocols, Eva allocated Greece’s limited testing resources on the basis of incoming travellers’ demographic information and testing results from previous travellers. By comparing Eva’s performance against modelled counterfactual scenarios, we show that Eva identified 1.85 times as many asymptomatic, infected travellers as random surveillance testing, with up to 2–4 times as many during peak travel, and 1.25–1.45 times as many asymptomatic, infected travellers as testing policies that utilize only epidemiological metrics. We demonstrate that this latter benefit arises, at least partially, because population-level epidemiological metrics had limited predictive value for the actual prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic travellers and exhibited strong country-specific idiosyncrasies in the summer of 2020. Our results raise serious concerns on the effectiveness of country-agnostic internationally proposed border control policies3 that are based on population-level epidemiological metrics. Instead, our work represents a successful example of the potential of reinforcement learning and real-time data for safeguarding public health.
Suggested Citation
Hamsa Bastani & Kimon Drakopoulos & Vishal Gupta & Ioannis Vlachogiannis & Christos Hadjichristodoulou & Pagona Lagiou & Gkikas Magiorkinis & Dimitrios Paraskevis & Sotirios Tsiodras, 2021.
"Efficient and targeted COVID-19 border testing via reinforcement learning,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 599(7883), pages 108-113, November.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:599:y:2021:i:7883:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04014-z
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04014-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Sanjay Jain & Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Jean Pauphilet & Kamalini Ramdas, 2023.
"Robust combination testing: methods and application to COVID-19 detection,"
Economics Series Working Papers
1009, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
- Aparajithan Venkateswaran & Jishnu Das & Tyler H. McCormick, 2023.
"Feasible contact tracing,"
Papers
2312.05718, arXiv.org.
- Susan Athey & Undral Byambadalai & Vitor Hadad & Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy & Weiwen Leung & Joseph Jay Williams, 2022.
"Contextual Bandits in a Survey Experiment on Charitable Giving: Within-Experiment Outcomes versus Policy Learning,"
Papers
2211.12004, arXiv.org.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:599:y:2021:i:7883:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04014-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.