Author
Listed:
- James Green
(NASA Headquarters)
- Tori Hoehler
(NASA Ames Research Center)
- Marc Neveu
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
University of Maryland)
- Shawn Domagal-Goldman
(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
- Daniella Scalice
(Paragon TEC/NASA Headquarters)
- Mary Voytek
(NASA Headquarters)
Abstract
Our generation could realistically be the one to discover evidence of life beyond Earth. With this privileged potential comes responsibility. The magnitude of the question of whether we are alone in the Universe, and the public interest therein, opens the possibility that results may be taken to imply more than the observations support, or than the observers intend. As life-detection objectives become increasingly prominent in space sciences, it is essential to open a community dialogue about how to convey information in a subject matter that is diverse, complicated and has a high potential to be sensationalized. Establishing best practices for communicating about life detection can serve to set reasonable expectations on the early stages of a hugely challenging endeavour, attach value to incremental steps along the path, and build public trust by making clear that false starts and dead ends are an expected and potentially productive part of the scientific process. Here we endeavour to motivate and seed the discussion with basic considerations and offer an example of how such considerations might be incorporated and applied in a proof-of-concept-level framework. Everything mentioned herein, including the name of the confidence scale, is intended not as a prescription, but simply as the beginning of an important dialogue.
Suggested Citation
James Green & Tori Hoehler & Marc Neveu & Shawn Domagal-Goldman & Daniella Scalice & Mary Voytek, 2021.
"Call for a framework for reporting evidence for life beyond Earth,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 598(7882), pages 575-579, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:598:y:2021:i:7882:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03804-9
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03804-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:598:y:2021:i:7882:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03804-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.